Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
References (22)
- et al.
A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial
Controlled Clin Trials
(1981) - et al.
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists
Controlled Clin Trials
(1995) - et al.
Validation of an index of the quality of review articles
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Agreement among reviewers of review articles
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Low molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis
J Clin Epidemiol
(1992) - et al.
Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable
JAMA
(1994) Evaluating the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth
- et al.
Guidelines for reading literature reviews
Can Med Assoc J
(1988)
Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests
Ann Intern Med
(1994)
Cited by (14415)
Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft, the Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain Ranges From 5.4% to 48.4% and the Incidence of Kneeling Pain Ranges From 4.0% to 75.6%: A Systematic Review of Level I Studies
2024, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and RehabilitationOncologic outcomes and surgical completeness of remote-access thyroidectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
2024, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
- ∗
As of January 1995, Dr. Jadad is at the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier Inc.