Article
Barriers to influenza vaccine acceptance A survey of physicians and nurses

https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-6553(89)90129-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP) recommends that health care providers who contact high-risk patients receive influenza immunization annually. There are few available data on hospital employees' acceptance of these recommendations or their attitudes about influenza immunization. In a hospital where no formal influenza immunization program was in place, a survey of 193 nursing personnel and physicians showed that only 2.1% received the 1986–1987 trivalent influenza vaccine and 3.2% the monovalent A/Taiwan/1/86 vaccine before the 1986–1987 influenza season. An influenza-like illness developed in a total of 35.3% of hospital employees during the influenza season, and 76.6% of them cared for patients while ill. Fear of adverse reactions, avoidance of medications, and the inconvenience of vaccine administration were frequently cited reasons for declining immunization. Hospital employees would be more inclined to receive future influenza immunization if vaccine administration were more accessible and if they were informed that immunization were a national health care policy. During the influenza season, nurses and physicians should be considered a uniformly susceptible reservoir of infection capable of transmitting influenza to patients. Moreover, ACIP guidelines alone probably will not lead to acceptable immunization rates among health care providers; organized institutional efforts to promote immunization of health care providers may be required.

References (16)

  • R. Kapila et al.

    A nosocomial outbreak of influenza A

    Chest

    (1977)
  • D.S. Fedson

    Influenza prevention and control: past practices and future prospects

    Am J Med

    (1987)
  • H.L. Blumenfeld et al.

    Studies on influenza in the pandemic of 1957–1958.1. An epidemiologic, clinical and serologic investigation of an intrahospital epidemic, with a note on vaccination efficacy

    J Clin Invest

    (1959)
  • L.P. Van Voris et al.

    Nosocomial influenza B virus infection in the elderly

    Ann Intern Med

    (1982)
  • R.A. Fralick

    Absenteeism among hospital staff during influenza epidemic

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1985)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    Prevention and control of influenza

    Ann Intern Med

    (1984)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP): prevention and control of influenza

    MMWR

    (1987)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    Recommendations for prevention and control of influenza

    Ann Intern Med

    (1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (189)

  • “The flu… is a little more complicated than a cold”: Knowledge, beliefs, and practices related to influenza and influenza vaccination among at-risk populations and health professionals in Peru

    2020, Vaccine
    Citation Excerpt :

    These perceptions in turn often resulted in overestimation of the vaccine’s side effect profile, misunderstandings of contraindications to vaccination, and reduced personal use of the vaccine. This finding is consistent with literature regarding vaccination of HPs in other settings, with some studies reporting as low as 2% vaccination coverage [16–17]. The suboptimal vaccination coverage among in-depth interviewees in this study was attributed in part to misperceptions about influenza and the influenza vaccine.

  • Attitudes, believes, determinants and organisational barriers behind the low seasonal influenza vaccination uptake in healthcare workers – A cross-sectional survey

    2018, Vaccine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the known advantages of immunizing HCWs, coverage rates are generally low, and range from 14% in Poland to 45.6% in England according to a recent review [10]. Reasons for low influenza vaccination uptake are diverse and comprise organisational barriers, such as lack in time and poor accessibility, doubts about the effectiveness, fear for side effects and personal reasons including the right to become ill themselves [11–19]. However, most studies tended to focus on HCWs from hospitals or nursing homes, rather than focussing on HCWs from both types of HCI.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text