Elsevier

Health Policy

Volume 36, Issue 2, May 1996, Pages 131-153
Health Policy

Review
Informed consent in clinical trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(95)00805-5Get rights and content

Abstract

A review is provided in this paper on the empirical literature on informed consent from 1979 to 1995 referring to information disclosure and trial participation in clinical trials. Articles being reviewed focus upon information disclosure, reactions to disclosure and recall, features of consent and perceptions of informed consent, both in hypothetical and in real life situations. It is concluded that further research is needed to study the process of informed consent in clinical trials, to obtain a better insight into the myth and reality of informed consent in daily practice. Future studies should come forward on the limitations of previous empirical research on informed consent. Additional research should focus on the perspectives of patients who accept or decline trial participation.

References (123)

  • R. Rivera et al.

    Evaluating the readability of informed consent forms used in contraceptive clinical trials

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (1992)
  • K. Quaid et al.

    Informed consent for a prescription drug impact of disclosed information on patient understanding and medical outcomes

    Patient Education and Counseling

    (1990)
  • K. Taylor

    Informed consent: the physicians' perspective

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1987)
  • C. Williams et al.

    Informed consent in European multicenter clinical trials. Are patients really informed?

    European Journal of Cancer

    (1994)
  • H. Leventhal et al.

    The behavioral dynamics of clinical trials

    Preventive Medicine

    (1991)
  • R. Gracely

    Clinicians expectations influence placebo analgesia

    The Lancet

    (1985)
  • E. Skovlund

    Should we tell trial patients that they might receive a placebo?

    The Lancet

    (1991)
  • M. Baum

    Do we need informed consent?

    The Lancet

    (1986)
  • H. Koch

    The concept of balanced autonomy in therapeutic and non-therapeutic trials

    Controlled Clinical Trials

    (1995)
  • B. Cassileth et al.

    Informed consent — why are its goals imperfectly realized?

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1980)
  • M. Cipriano Silva et al.

    Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent a review of clinical research

    IRB A Human Review of Human Subjects Research

    (1988)
  • C. Kaufman

    Informed consent and patient research

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1983)
  • A. Meisel et al.

    Towards an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies

    Arizona Law Review

    (1983)
  • G. Morrow et al.

    Behavioral aspects of clinical trials. An integrated framework for behavioral theory

    Cancer

    (1994)
  • H. Taub

    Comprehension of informed consent for research issues and directions for future study. IRB a review of human subjects research

    The Hastings Center

    (1986)
  • J. Ende et al.

    Measuring patients' desire for autonomy. Decision making and information seeking preferences among medical patients

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (1989)
  • H. Sutherland

    Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

    (1989)
  • H. Muss et al.

    Written informed consent in patients with breast cancer

    Cancer

    (1979)
  • G. Morrow et al.

    A simple technique for increasing patients' knowledge of informed consent to treatment

    Cancer

    (1978)
  • B. Cassileth et al.

    Information and participation preferences among cancer patients

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (1980)
  • C. Lavelle-Jones et al.

    Factors affecting quality of informed consent

    British Medical Journal

    (1993)
  • J. Christensen et al.

    Circumcision and informed consent: Is more information always better?

    Medical Care

    (1987)
  • D. Byrne et al.

    How informed is informed consent?

    British Medical Journal

    (1988)
  • W. Freeman

    Effect of informed consent and educational background on patient knowledge anxiety and subjective responses to cardiac catheterisation

    Catheterisation and Cardiovascular Diagnosis

    (1981)
  • J. Katz et al.

    Informed consent and the prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    Arthritis and Rheumatism

    (1992)
  • B. Oddens et al.

    Hoe goed zijn deelnemers aan een klinisch onderzoek geïnformeerd?

    Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

    (1992)
  • B. Rimer et al.

    Informed consent: a crucial step in cancer patient education

    Health Education Quarterly

    (1984)
  • N. Aaronson et al.

    Informed consent and cancer clinical trials

  • M. Dodd et al.

    Chemotherapy: helping patients to know the drugs they are receiving and their possible side-effects

    Cancer Nursing

    (1981)
  • President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research
  • M. Uden et al.

    Informed consent bij klinisch kanderonderzoek: psychologische aspecten

    Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

    (1986)
  • A. Schultz et al.

    Are research subjects really informed

    Western Journal of Medicine

    (1975)
  • G. Askew et al.

    Informed consent: can we educate patients?

    Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh

    (1990)
  • M. Cipriano Silva et al.

    Factors influencing comprehension of information for informed consent

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (1984)
  • H. Taub et al.

    Informed consent for research. Effects of readability, patient age and education

    Journal of the American Geriatric Society

    (1986)
  • A. Meisel et al.

    What do and do we not know about informed consent

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1981)
  • G. Morrow et al.

    Informed consent to treatment in clinical trials

    Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy

    (1983)
  • H.t Taub

    Informed consent, memory and age

    Gerontologist

    (1980)
  • B. Kennedy et al.

    Patient recall of informed consent

    Medical and Paediatric Oncology

    (1979)
  • J. Bergler et al.

    Informed consent: how much does the patient understand?

    Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

    (1980)

    • Cited by (44)

    • Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?

      2009, American Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Regarding the important issue of voluntarism, however, half of the studies that provided relevant data revealed an adequate rate of understanding among the participating subjects. This could be related to patients' preference to defer the decision of participation to their physicians70 or to fear of being deprived of adequate clinical care. However, it should be mentioned that the concept of randomization was highly understood by most subjects in only half of the studies that provided relevant data.

    • Determination of required content of the informed consent process for human participants in biomedical research conducted in the U.S.: A practical tool to assist clinical investigators

      2008, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Study Sponsors, local IRBs, and study team members may provide assistance to the Principal Investigator with regard to the consent documents and consent conferences, however, the Principal Investigator is ultimately responsible for the entire consent process. There is an extensive literature related to the informed consent process for clinical research study participants and the use of informed consent forms (articles and books with useful bibliographies [1–8]); it is one of the relatively few areas of clinical research ethics that has received in-depth attention from bioethicists and researchers. Despite this well-deserved attention, there exist significant practical questions and issues pertaining to the implementation of U.S. regulatory requirements and international guidelines and to the actual practice of performing consent processes.

    • Multimedia educational aids for improving consumer knowledge about illness management and treatment decisions: A review of randomized controlled trials

      2008, Journal of Psychiatric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      We excluded studies that focused on theoretical healthcare decisions because of potential concerns regarding the validity of hypothetical medical conditions. It has been suggested by some that people make different decisions when the treatment prospect is theoretical versus real (Schain, 1994; Verheggen and van Wijmen, 1996). In addition, investigations focusing on caregivers and children were also excluded because such studies are complicated by the fact that two parties (patient plus caregiver or parent) are involved, and require valid assessment procedures for both of the groups.

    • Monetary Incentives Improve Recall of Research Consent Information: It Pays to Remember

      2009, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

    • Opportunity Cost or Opportunity Lost: An Empirical Assessment of Ethical Concerns and Attitudes of EEG Neurofeedback Users

      2022, Neuroethics

    • Patient and Proxy Recall After Providing Written or Oral Informed Consent to Participate in an Interventional Trial

      2022, JAMA Network Open
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text
    Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier B.V.