VIEWPOINTIs non-directive genetic counselling possible?
References (6)
Genetics, ethics, and audit
Lancet
(1990)- et al.
Study on the frequencies of alleles HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 genes in a group of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients in the Russian population of Moscow
(1991)
Cited by (195)
Conveying Information About Screening and Diagnosis
2019, Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical PracticeCell-Free DNA-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Society
2018, Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Applied Genomics in Prenatal Screening and DiagnosisEthical and social issues in clinical genetics
2018, Emery and Rimoin's Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics and Genomics: Clinical Principles and ApplicationsEthical issues in genetic counseling
2017, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyAnticipated stigma and blameless guilt: Mothers' evaluation of life with the sex-linked disorder, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XHED)
2016, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :Similarly, those making antenatal screening programmes available – both the policy makers and at least some health professionals – have an expectation that pregnant women will (and, by implication, ‘should’) participate in screening designed to identify pregnancies in which the foetus has Down syndrome and/or a serious malformation. The pressure exerted in such screening programmes, arising from the very existence of the screening programme, can amount almost to coercion, whatever the wishes and intentions of the individual professionals involved (Clarke, 1991, 1997; Rothman, 1988; Rapp, 2000). More recently, the meaning of responsibility in relation to genetics has broadened very considerably as the scope of applicability of genetics has broadened from its earlier focus in the sphere of reproduction to include the whole breadth of medicine and healthcare more generally (‘mainstreaming genomics’).
Analyzing communication in genetic consultations-A systematic review
2015, Patient Education and Counseling