Abstract
Advances in genetic technologies raise a multitude of ethical issues, some of which give rise to novel dilemmas for medical practice. One of the most controversial problems arising in clinical genetics is that of confidentiality and who may disclose genetic health information. This paper considers the question of when it is appropriate for health professionals to disclose clinically significant genetic information without patient consent. Existing ethical principles offer little guidance in relation to this issue. We build on suggestions that genetic information may be viewed as collective or shared information, and we introduce the concept of ‘familial comity’ as a fresh way to consider the issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial (1998). Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 474–483.
Australian Law Reform Commission (2003). Report 96: Essentially yours: Protection of human genetic information in Australia. Canberra: ALRC.
Bell, D., & Bennett, B. (2001). Genetic secrets and the family. Medical Law Review, 9, 130–161.
Breheny, N., Geelhoed, E., Goldblatt, J., Ee, H., O’Leary, P. (2006). Economic evaluation of the familial cancer program in Western Australia: Predictive Genetic Testing for FAP and HNPCC. Community Genetics, 9, 98–106.
Clarke, A. (1994). The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK). Journal of Medical Genetics, 31, 785–797.
Clarke, A., Richards, M., Kerzin-Storrar, L., Halliday, J., Young, M., Simpson, S., et al. (2005). Genetic professionals’ reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. European Journal of Human Genetics, 13, 556–562.
Council General Medical (2004). Confidentiality: Protecting and Providing Genetic Information. London.
Coupland, R., Martin, S., Dutli, M. T., Coupland, R., & Martin, S. (2005). Protecting everybody’s genetic data. Lancet, 365, 1754–1756.
Dugan, R., Weisner, G., Juegst, E., O’Riordan, M., Matthews, A., & Robin, N. (2003). Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: Genetic counselor’s clinical experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 119, 27–34.
Dumitrescu, R., & Cotarla, I. (2005). Understanding breast cancer risk – Where do we stand in 2005? Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 9(1), 208–221.
Giardiello, F. M., Brensinger, J. D., & Petersen, G. M. (2001). AGA technical review on hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing. Gastroenterology, 121, 198–213.
Gillam, L., & Little, J. (2001). Confidentiality. Medical Journal of Australia, 174, 296–297.
Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Murday, V., & Watson, M. (2003). Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 74–79.
Human Genetics Society of Australasia (2005). Predictive Testing in Children and Adolescents (April).
Inside Information: Balancing interests in the use of personal genetic data. London, Human Genetics Commission. May (2002).
Knoppers, B., Strom, C., Wright-Clayton, E., Murray, T., Fibison, W., & Luther, L. (1998). Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 474–483.
Laurance, J. (2005). A family secret... that could be a killer. The Independent (May 10;Sect. 1).
Lerman, C., Peshkin, B., Hughes, C., & Isaacs, C. (1995). Family disclosure in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 1(353), 353–375.
McGivern, B., Everett, J., Yager, G., Baumiller, R., Hafertepen, A., & Saal, H. (2004). Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. General Medicine, 6(6), 503–509.
National Health and Medical Research Council (1992). Ethical aspects of human genetic testing: An information paper. Canberra: NHMRC.
National Health and Medical Research Council (1999). Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. Canberra, Australia: AGPS.
Newson, A. (2004). The nature and significance of behavioural genetic information. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 25, 89–111.
Noble, T. (2002). Let us warn patients of cancer mutation, say doctors. The Age.
Parker, M., & Lucassen, A. (2004). Genetic information: A joint account? Basic Music Journal, 329, 165–167.
Richards, M. (2001). Distinctive is Genetic Information? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 32C, 663–687.
Savulescu, J., & Robertson, S. (2001). Is there a case in favour of predictive genetic testing in young children? Bioethics, 15, 27–49.
Skene, L., & Charlsworth, M. (1996). The new genetics: Legal and ethical implications for medicine. Medical Journal of Australia, 165, 301–303.
Smith, K., West, J., Croyle, R., & Botkin, J. (1999). Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Moderating effect of siblings’ test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 8, 385–392.
Wachbroit, R., & Wasserman, D. (2003). Patient autonomy and value-neutrality in nondirective genetic counseling. In B. Steinbock, J. D. Arras, & A. J. London (Eds.), Ethical issues in modern medicine (pp. 563–571). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing Interests: None declared. Funding: No special funding was secured for this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davey, A., Newson, A. & O’Leary, P. Communication of Genetic Information within Families: The Case for Familial Comity. Bioethical Inquiry 3, 161–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-006-9022-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-006-9022-5