Skip to main content
Log in

Religious Hospitals and Primary Care Physicians: Conflicts over Policies for Patient Care

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Religiously affiliated hospitals provide nearly 20% of US beds, and many prohibit certain end-of-life and reproductive health treatments. Little is known about physician experiences in religious institutions.

OBJECTIVE

Assess primary care physicians’ experiences and beliefs regarding conflict with religious hospital policies for patient care.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

General internists, family physicians, and general practitioners from the AMA Masterfile.

MAIN MEASURES

In a questionnaire mailed in 2007, we asked physicians whether they had worked in a religiously affiliated hospital or practice, whether they had experienced conflict with the institution over religiously based patient care policies and how they believed physicians should respond to such conflicts. We used chi-square and multivariate logistic regression to examine associations between physicians’ demographic and religious characteristics and their responses.

KEY RESULTS

Of 879 eligible physicians, 446 (51%) responded. In analyses adjusting for survey design, 43% had worked in a religiously affiliated institution. Among these, 19% had experienced conflict over religiously based policies. Most physicians (86%) believed when clinical judgment conflicts with religious hospital policy, physicians should refer patients to another institution. Compared with physicians ages 26–29 years, older physicians were less likely to have experienced conflict with religiously based policies [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) compared with 30–34 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.11); 35–46 years: 0.07 (0.01–0.72); 47–60 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.10)]. Compared with those who never attend religious services, those who do attend were less likely to have experienced conflict [attend once a month or less: odds ratio 0.06 (0.01–0.29); attend twice a month or more: 0.22 (0.05–0.98)]. Respondents with no religious affiliation were more likely than others to believe doctors should disregard religiously based policies that conflict with clinical judgment (13% vs. 3%; p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Hospitals and policy-makers may need to balance the competing claims of physician autonomy and religiously based institutional policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uttley LJ, Pawelko R. No strings attached: Public funding of religiously-sponsored hospitals in the United States. New York: MergerWatch; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services. 5th ed. Washington: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chuang CH, Waldman LJ, Freund KM, Ash AS. Emergency contraception: Prescribing practices of general internists compared with other primary care physicians. Contraception. 2004;69:43–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartman BA, Weiss KB. Women’s primary care in the United States: A study of practice variation among physician specialties. J Womens Health. 1993;2(3):261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Landefeld CS, Callahan CM, Woolard N. General internal medicine and geriatrics: Building a foundation to improve the training of general internists in the care of older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(7):609–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Warshaw G, Murphy J, Buehler J, Singleton S. Geriatric medicine training for family practice residents in teh 21st century: A report from the residency assistance Program/Hartford geriatrics initiative. Fam Med. 2003;35(1):24–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazzard WR, Woolard N, Regenstreif DI. Internal medicine: At the nexus of the health care system in respoding to the demographic imperative of an aging population. Am J Med. 2001;110:507–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulksy JA. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:283–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curlin FA, Lawrence RE, Chin MH, Lantos JD. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(6):593–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson DF. The institutional turn in professional ethics. Ethics Behav. 1999;9(2):109–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raghavan R. A question of faith. JAMA. 2007;297(13):1412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freedman LR, Landy U, Steinauer J. When there’s a heartbeat: Miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(10):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45 Part 88. Ensuring that Department of Health and Human Services Funds do Not Support Coercive Or Discriminatory Policies Or Practices in Violation of Federal Law. Available at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title45/45cfr88_main_02.tpl. Accessed February 2, 2010.

  14. Stein R. Health workers’ ‘conscience’ rule set to be voided. Washington Post. 2009(A01); Feb 28, 2009.

  15. Hitt G. GOP antiabortion provision in health bill defeated. Wall Street Journal. 2009(A6), Oct 1.

  16. Stein R. Workers’ religious freedom vs. patients’ rights. Washington Post. 2008(A01), July 31.

  17. Labi N. Holy owned. is it fair for a Catholic hospital to impose its morals on patients? Time. 1999;154(20):85–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lauderdale DS, Kestenbaum B. Asian american ethnic identification by surname. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2000;19(3):283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lauderdale DS. Birth outcomes for arabic-named women in california before and after september 11. Demography. 2006;43(1):185–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Allport GW, Ross JM. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967;5(4):432–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill PC, Hood RW, eds. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Ala.: Religious Education Press; 1999.

  22. Curlin FA, Lantos JD, Roach CJ, Sellergren SA, Chin MH. Religious characteristics of US physicians: A national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(7):629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourageau R. Survey methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2004:326.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Uttley LJ. How merging religious and secular hospitals can threaten health care. Soc Policy. 2000;30(3):4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harrison T. Availability of emergency contraception: A survey of hospital emergency department staff. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(2):105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawrence RE, Curlin FA. Physicians’ beliefs about conscience in medicine: A national survey. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1276–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawrence RE, Curlin FA. Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: Findings from a national physician survey. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(4):214–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Winkler EC. The ethics of policy writing: How should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices? J Med Ethics. 2005;31(10):559–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was provided by the Greenwall Foundation, New York, NY, and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (1 K23 AT002749). Mr. Lawrence’s time was supported by the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Summer Research Program. The study was presented at the annual meeting of the North American Primary Care Group, November 18, 2008.

We thank Joshua Kellemen for assistance with data collection and management; Kenneth Rasinski for assistance with data analysis; and Bernard Ewigman for manuscript review.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra B. Stulberg MD, MA.

Additional information

Support: (1) The Greenwall Foundation, New York, NY; (2) National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (1 K23 AT002749); (3) Pritzker School of Medicine Summer Research Program

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 410 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stulberg, D.B., Lawrence, R.E., Shattuck, J. et al. Religious Hospitals and Primary Care Physicians: Conflicts over Policies for Patient Care. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 725–730 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1329-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1329-6

KEY WORDS

Navigation