Skip to main content
Log in

Abandoning the language of “response shift”: a plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of life researchers have been studying “response shift” for a decade now, in an effort to clarify how best to measure QoL over time and across changing circumstances. However, we contend that this line of research has been impeded by conceptual confusion created by the term “response shift”, that lumps together sources of measurement error (e.g., scale recalibration) with true causes of changing QoL (e.g., hedonic adaptation). We propose abandoning the term response shift, in favor of less ambiguous terms, like scale recalibration and adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (1999). Introduction to symposium on the challenge of response shift in social science and medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1505–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibbons, F. X. (1999). Social comparison as a mediator of response shift. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1517–1530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daltroy, L., Larson, M., Eaton, H., Phillips, C., & Liang, M. (1999). Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: The influence of response shift and other factors. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1549–1561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz, C., & Sendor, R. (1999). Helping others helps oneself: Response shift effects in peer support. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1563–1575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, I. B. (1999). Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response shift. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1577–1588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz, C., Bode, R., Repucci, N., Becker, J., Sprangers, M., & Fayers, P. (2006). The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: A meta-analysis of response shift. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1533–1550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48(8), 977–988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ubel, P. A., Loewenstein, G., & Jepson, C. (2003). Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Quality of Life Research, 12(6), 599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ubel, P. A. (2006). You’re stronger than you think: Tapping into the secrets of emotionally resilient people. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, A., Smith, D., Langa, K. M., & Fagerlin, A. (2005). What is perfect health to an 85-year-old?: Evidence for scale recalibration in subjective health ratings. Medical Care, 43(10), 1054–1057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lepore, S. J., & Eton, D. T. (2000). Response shifts in prostate cancer patients: An evaluation of suppressor and buffer modes. In C. E. Schwartz & M. A. Sprangers (Eds.), Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research (1st ed., pp. 37–51). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loewenstein, G., & Ubel, P. (2008). Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8–9), 1795–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brossart, D., Clay, D., & Willson, V. (2002). Methodological and statistical considerations for threats to internal validity in pediatric outcome data: Response shift in self-report outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(1), 97–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz, C., Sprangers, M., Carey, A., & Reed, G. (2004). Exploring response shift in longitudinal data. Psychology & Health, 19(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Norman, G. (2003). Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Quality of Life Research, 12, 239–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96(2), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lacey, H. P., Smith, D. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). Hope I die before I get old: Mispredicting happiness across the lifespan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, D., Loewenstein, G., Jankovich, S., Jepson, C., Feldman, H., & Ubel, P. (2008). Mispredicting and misremembering: patients with renal failure overestimate improvements in quality of life after a kidney transplant. Health Psychology, 27(5), 653–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, D., Schwarz, N., Roberts, T., & Ubel, P. (2006). Why are you calling me? How survey introductions change response patterns. Quality of Life Research, 15, 621–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Ubel is supported by a Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy Investigators Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. Ubel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ubel, P.A., Peeters, Y. & Smith, D. Abandoning the language of “response shift”: a plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life. Qual Life Res 19, 465–471 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9592-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9592-x

Keywords

Navigation