Abstract
The attention for Moral case deliberation (MCD) has increased over the past years. Previous research on MCD is often written from the perspective of MCD experts or MCD participants and we lack a more distant view to the role of MCD in Dutch health care institutions in general. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the state of the art concerning MCD in the Netherlands. As part of a larger national study on clinical ethics support in the Netherlands, we will focus on the prevalence and characteristics of MCD in Dutch health. A mixed methods design was used in which we combined two survey questionnaires (sent to all health care institutions), two focus groups and 17 individual interviews with top managers or ethics support staff. The findings demonstrate that the prevalence of MCD is relatively high in Dutch health care (44 % has MCD), especially in mental health care (in which MCD is mentioned as present in the organization by 62 % of the respondents). Institutions with MCD differ from institutions without MCD concerning size, kind of problems and importance of ideological background. Characteristic of MCD is that it often exists for 3 years or more, has a high participation of health professionals and middle managers and is both organized scheduled as unscheduled. As well integration in existing policy as key persons emerge as important issues in relation to the positioning of MCD. We conclude that MCD is a part of an integrated ethics policy and serves as a (bottom up) catalyst for such an integrated ethics policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abma, T.A., B. Molewijk, and G.A. Widdershoven, 2009. Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Analysis 17(3): 217–235.
ASBH’ Task force on standards for bioethics consultation. 1998. Core competencies for health ethics consultation. ASBH: The report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
Aulisio, M.P., R.M. Arnold, and S.J. Youngner (eds.). 2003. Ethics consultation. From theory to practice. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Fox, E., Bottrell, M.M., Berkowitz, K.A., Chanko, B.L., Foglia, M.B., and R.A. Pearlman. 2010. Integratedethics: An innovative program to improve ethics quality in health care. Innovation Journal 15(2): 1–36.
Kessels, J., E. Boers, and P. Mostert. 2009. Free space. Field guide to conversations. Amsterdam: Boom publishers.
Mertens D.M. 2010. Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Integrating Diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.
Molewijk, A.C., T. Abma, M. Stolper, and G. Widdershoven. 2008a. Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(2): 120–124.
Molewijk, B., M. Verkerk, H. Milius, and G. Widdershoven. 2008b. Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11(1): 43–56.
Molewijk, B., E. Zadelhoff, B. Lendemeijer, and G. Widdershoven. 2008c. Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care. Bioethica Forum 1(1): 57–65.
Molewijk, B., and R. Ahlzen. 2011. Clinical Ethics Committee Case 13: Should the school doctor contact the mother of a 17-year-old girl who has expressed suicidal thoughts? Clinical Ethics 6(1): 5–10.
Molewijk, B., D. Kleinlugtenbelt, and G. Widdershoven. 2011a. The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: Theory, practice, and methodology. Bioethics 25(7): 383–393.
Molewijk, B., D. Kleinlugtenbelt, S.M. Pugh, and G. Widdershoven. 2011b. Emotions and clinical ethics support. A moral inquiry into emotions in moral case deliberation. HEC Forum 23(4): 257–268.
Plantinga, M., B. Molewijk, M. de Bree, M. Moraal, M. Verkerk, and G.A. Widdershoven. 2012. Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: Evaluation of a Dutch training programme. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(10): 630–635.
Reither-Theil, S., M. Mertz, J. Schurmann, N. Stingelin Giles, and B. Meyer-Zehnder. 2011. Evidence-competence-discourse: The theoretical framework of the multi-centre clinical ethics support project METAP. Bioethics 25(7): 403–412.
Steinkamp, N., and Gordijn, B. 2003. Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four methods. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6(3): 235–246.
Stolper, M., Metselaar, S., Molewijk, B., and G. Widdershoven. 2012. Moral case deliberation in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands. Tensions between theory and practice. Journal International de Bioéthique 23(3–4):53–66.
van Dartel, J.N., M. Jacobs, and R.J.M. Jeurissen. 2002. Ethiek bedrijven in de zorg. Gorcum bv, Assen: Een zaak van het management.
van der Dam, S.S., T.A. Abma, A.C. Molewijk, M.J. Kardol, J.M. Schols, and G.A. Widdershoven. 2011. Organizing moral case deliberation experiences in two Dutch nursing homes. Nursing Ethics 18(3): 327–340.
van der Dam, S., Abma, T.A., Kardol, M.J., and G.A. Widdershoven. 2012. “Here’s my dilemma”. Moral case deliberation as a platform for discussing everyday ethics in elderly care. Health Care Analysis 20(3): 250–267.
van der Dam, S., Schols, J.M., Kardol, T.J., Molewijk, B.C., Widdershoven, G.A., and T.A. Abma. 2013. The discovery of deliberation. From ambiguity to appreciation through the learning process of doing Moral Case Deliberation in Dutch elderly care. Social Science and Medicine 83:125–132.
van Willigenburg, T., M. Verweij, C.H.M. Kleemans, and H.H. van der Kloot-Meijburg. 1991. Ethiek, levensbeschouwing en het management in instellingen voor intramurale gezondheidszorg, 109–110. Utrecht: Nationaal Ziekenhuisinstituut.
Weidema, F.C., B.A.C. Molewijk, F. Kamsteeg, and G.A.M. Widdershoven. 2013. Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation. Nursing Ethics. doi:10.1177/0969733012473773.
Weidema, F.C., A.C. Molewijk, G.A.M. Widdershoven, and T.A. Abma. 2012. Enacting ethics: Bottom-up involvement in implementing moral case deliberation. Health Care Analysis 20: 1–19.
Weidema, F.C., T.A. Abma, G.A.M. Widdershoven, and A.C. Molewijk. 2011. Client participation in moral case deliberation: A precarious relational balance. HEC Forum 23: 207–224.
Widdershoven, G. and B., Molewijk. 2010. Philosophical foundations of clinical ethics: A hermeneutic perspective. In Clinical ethics consultation theories and methods, implementation, evaluation, 37–51. UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Acknowledgments
This article is a part of a research project financially supported by the Department of Ethics from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. We thank all respondents for their effort and valuable contribution to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dauwerse, L., Stolper, M., Widdershoven, G. et al. Prevalence and characteristics of moral case deliberation in Dutch health care. Med Health Care and Philos 17, 365–375 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9537-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9537-6