Skip to main content
Log in

Substitute decision making in medicine: comparative analysis of the ethico-legal discourse in England and Germany

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health care decision making for patients without decisional capacity is ethically and legally challenging. Advance directives (living wills) have proved to be of limited usefulness in clinical practice. Therefore, academic attention should focus more on substitute decision making by the next of kin. In this article, we comparatively analyse the legal approaches to substitute medical decision making in England and Germany. Based on the current ethico-legal discourse in both countries, three aspects of substitute decision making will be highlighted: (1) Should there be a legally predefined order of relatives who serve as health care proxies? (2) What should be the respective roles and decisional powers of patient-appointed versus court-appointed substitute decision-makers? (3) Which criteria should be determined by law to guide substitute decision-makers?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • British Medical Association: 2005, ‹Mental Capacity Act’, Ethics Brief 75, online at http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/EthicsBrief75~Mentalhealth?OpenDocument&Highlight=2,mental,capacity,Act (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Buchanan A., D. Brock: 1990, Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesärztekammer, 2004: ‹Grundsätze zur ärztlichen Sterbebegleitung’, Deutsches ärzteblatt 101(19), A-1298–1299

  • Collins L.G., S.M. Parks, L. Winter: 2006, The State of Advance Care Planning: One Decade After SUPPORT. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 23(5), 378–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidgenössisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartment: 2003, Förderung des Selbstbestimmungsrechts, Medienmitteilung vom 26.6.2003 http://www.ejpd.admin.ch/ejpd/de/home/dokumentation/mi/2003/2003-06-262.html (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Emanuel L.L., M.J. Barry, J.D. Stoeckle, L.M. Ettelson, E.J. Emanuel: 1991, Advance Directives for Medical Care – A Case for Greater Use. The New England Journal of Medicine 324(13), 889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlin A., C.E. Schneider: 2004, Enough. The Failure of the Living Will. The Hastings Center Report 34(2), 30–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzini L., L. Volicer, W.A. Nelson, E. Fox, A.R. Derse: 2004, Ten Myths About Decision Making Capacity. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 5(4), 263–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • General Medical Council: 1998, Seeking Patients’ Consent: the Ethical Considerations. London

  • General Medical Council: 2002, Withholding and Withdrawing Life-prolonging Treatments: Good Practice in Decision making. London

  • General Medical Council: 2004, Briefing on the Mental Capacity Bill. London, 7 Oct 2004. Online at http://www.gmcpressoffice.org.uk/apps/news/mediabrief/detail.php?key=75 (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Goodman M.D., M. Tarnoff, G.J. Slotman: 1998, Effect of Advance Directives on the Management of Elderly Critically Ill Patients. Critical Care Medicine 26(4), 701–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins N.A., P.H. Ditto, J.H. Danks, W.D. Smucker: 2005, Micromanaging Death: Process Preferences, Values, and goals in End-of-life Medical Decision Making. Gerontologist 45(1), 107–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy I., A. Grubb: 2000, Medical Law, 3rd edition. London: Butterworths

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish Wallace S., C.G. Martin, A.D. Shaw, K.J. Price: 2001, Influence of an Advance Directive on the Initiation of Life Support Technology in Critically Ill Cancer Patients. Critical Care Medicine 29(12), 2294–2298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang F., T. Quill: 2004, Making Decisions with Families at the End of Life. American Family Physician 70(4), 719–723

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Making Decisions Alliance: 2005, Making Decisions Alliance Welcomes Introduction of the Mental Capacity Act. London: Press release 8 April 2005, online at http://www.makingdecisions.org.uk/news_release_04_05.htm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Malloy T.R., R.S. Wigton, J. Meeske, T.G. Tape: 1992, The Influence of Treatment Descriptions on Advance Medical Directive Decisions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 40(12), 1255–1260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur D.J., J.F. Merz: 1993, How the Manner of Presentation of Data Influences Older Patients in Determining Their Treatment Preferences. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 41(3), 223–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski S.: 2005, Advance Refusals of Life-sustaining Medical Treatment: the Relativity of an Absolute Right. Modern Law Review 68(6), 958–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller B.: 1995, Autonomy, In: W.T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 5th edition. London: Prentice Hall International, pp. 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison R.S., E. Olson, K.R. Mertz, D.E. Meier: 1995, The Inaccessibility of Advance Directives on Transfer from Ambulatory to Acute Care Settings. JAMA 274(6), 478–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy D.J., D. Burrows, S. Santilli, A.W. Kemp, S. Tenner, B. Kreling, J. Teno: 1994, The influence of the probability of survival on patients’ preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The New England Journal of Medicine 330(8), 545–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast T.J.: 2001, Advance Care Planning: Pitfalls, Progress, Promise. Critical Care Medicine 29(2 Suppl), N34–N39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Probst M., B. Knittel: 2001, Gesetzliche Vertretung durch Angehörige – Alternative zur Betreuung? ZRP 2, 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchalski C.M., Z. Zhong, M.M. Jacobs, E. Fox, J. Lynn, J. Harrold, A. Galanos, R.S. Phillips, R. Califf, J.M. Teno: 2000, Patients Who Want Their Family and Physician to Make Resuscitation Decisions for Them: Observations From SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48(5 Suppl), 84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahm S., R. Will, G. Hommel: 2005, Attitudes Towards and Barriers to Writing Advance Directives Amongst Cancer Patients, Healthy Controls, and Medical Staff, Journal of Medical Ethics 31(8), 437–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seale C.: 2006, Characteristics of End-of-life Decisions: Survey of UK Medical Practitioners. Palliative Medicine 20(7), 653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal A., A. Galbraith, M. Chesney, P. Schoenfeld, G. Charles, B. Lo: 1992, How Strictly do Dialysis Patients Want Their Advance Directives Followed? JAMA 267(1), 59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shalowitz D.I., E. Garrett-Mayer, D. Wendler: 2006, The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision-makers: A Systematic Review. Archives of Internal Medicine 166(5), 493–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strätling, M., H. Strätling-Tölle, V.E. Scharf, P. Schmucker: 2003, „Automatische“ gesetzliche Stellvertretung nicht entscheidungsfähiger Patienten durch „nahe Angehörige“? MedR, 21(7), 372–379

  • Teno J., J. Lynn, N. Wenger, R.S. Phillips, D.P. Murphy, A.F. Connors Jr., N. Desbiens, W. Fulkerson, P. Bellamy, W.A. Knaus: 1997a, Advance Directives for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: Effectiveness with the Patient Self-determination Act and the SUPPORT Intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(4), 500–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teno J.M., S. Licks, J. Lynn, N. Wenger, A.F. Connors Jr., R.S. Phillips, M.A. O’Connor, D.P. Murphy, W.J. Fulkerson, N. Desbiens, W.A. Knaus: 1997b, Do Advance Directives Provide Instructions that Direct Care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(4), 508–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treloar, A.: 2004, ‹The Mental Capacity Bill – Gateway to Euthanasia?’ Triple Helix Autumn, 6–7. Online at http://www.cmf.org.uk/literature/content.asp?context=article&id=1273 (accessed on 7 Feb 2007)

  • Vossler, N.: 2003, Gesetzliche Vertretungsmacht für Angehörige – Eine Alternative zur Betreuung? Eine Erwiderung auf Probst/Knittel. BtPRAX 1, 6–11

English and American legal sources

  • Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] AC 789 (HL)

  • American Medical Directors Association: 2007, White Paper on Surrogate Decision making and Advance Care Planning in Long-Term Care. Online at http://www.amda.com/governance/whitepapers/surrogate/surrogate.cfm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Butler v. Freeman [1756] Amb. 302

  • Children Act 1989, In M.A. Jones, A.E. Morris (eds.), Statues on Medical Law, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Constitutional Affairs: 2003, Draft Mental Incapacity Bill. London: Cm 5859-I & II. Online at http://www.dca.gov.uk/menincap/meninc.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Department for Constitutional Affairs: 2006, Mental Capacity Act 2005 Draft Code of Practice. Online at http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/codepractise/codeofpractice.htm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Enduring Powers of Attorney Act 1985. London: The Stationery Office

  • F. v. West Berkshire H.A. [1990] 2 A.C. 1

  • Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986] AC 112

  • House of Lords: 2005, ‹Mental Capacity Bill’, Hansard 671, columns 412–459

  • Law Commission: 1989, Report No. 185: Fourth Programme of Law Reform. London: The Stationery Office Cm 800

  • Law Commission: 1995, Report No. 231: Mental Incapacity. London: The Stationery Office HC 189

  • Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). London: Office of Public Sector Information. Online at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050009.htm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)

  • Patient Self-Determination Act 1990 (as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act 1990). Washington: Pub. L. No. 101–508

  • Presidents’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1989, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington D.C.: The Commission/G.P.O

  • R (Burke) v. General Medical Council [2005] 2 WLR 431

  • Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) [2000] 1 FCR 193

  • Re AK (Medical Treatment: Consent) [2001] 1 FLR 129

  • Re C (Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 All ER 819 (Fam Div)

  • Re MB (Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FLR 426 (CA)

  • Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation) [2001] Fam 15

  • Re S (Sterilisation) [2000] 2 FLR 389

  • Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 (CA)

  • R (on the application of Burke) v. General Medical Council [2005] EWCA Civ 1003

  • Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 NY 125 (1914)

  • W Healthcare NHS Trust v. H [2005] 1 WLR 834

German legal sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf J. Jox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jox, R.J., Michalowski, S., Lorenz, J. et al. Substitute decision making in medicine: comparative analysis of the ethico-legal discourse in England and Germany. Med Health Care Philos 11, 153–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9112-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9112-0

Keywords

Navigation