Abstract
Health care decision making for patients without decisional capacity is ethically and legally challenging. Advance directives (living wills) have proved to be of limited usefulness in clinical practice. Therefore, academic attention should focus more on substitute decision making by the next of kin. In this article, we comparatively analyse the legal approaches to substitute medical decision making in England and Germany. Based on the current ethico-legal discourse in both countries, three aspects of substitute decision making will be highlighted: (1) Should there be a legally predefined order of relatives who serve as health care proxies? (2) What should be the respective roles and decisional powers of patient-appointed versus court-appointed substitute decision-makers? (3) Which criteria should be determined by law to guide substitute decision-makers?
Similar content being viewed by others
References
British Medical Association: 2005, ‹Mental Capacity Act’, Ethics Brief 75, online at http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/EthicsBrief75~Mentalhealth?OpenDocument&Highlight=2,mental,capacity,Act (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Buchanan A., D. Brock: 1990, Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bundesärztekammer, 2004: ‹Grundsätze zur ärztlichen Sterbebegleitung’, Deutsches ärzteblatt 101(19), A-1298–1299
Collins L.G., S.M. Parks, L. Winter: 2006, The State of Advance Care Planning: One Decade After SUPPORT. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 23(5), 378–384
Eidgenössisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartment: 2003, Förderung des Selbstbestimmungsrechts, Medienmitteilung vom 26.6.2003 http://www.ejpd.admin.ch/ejpd/de/home/dokumentation/mi/2003/2003-06-262.html (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Emanuel L.L., M.J. Barry, J.D. Stoeckle, L.M. Ettelson, E.J. Emanuel: 1991, Advance Directives for Medical Care – A Case for Greater Use. The New England Journal of Medicine 324(13), 889–895
Fagerlin A., C.E. Schneider: 2004, Enough. The Failure of the Living Will. The Hastings Center Report 34(2), 30–42
Ganzini L., L. Volicer, W.A. Nelson, E. Fox, A.R. Derse: 2004, Ten Myths About Decision Making Capacity. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 5(4), 263–267
General Medical Council: 1998, Seeking Patients’ Consent: the Ethical Considerations. London
General Medical Council: 2002, Withholding and Withdrawing Life-prolonging Treatments: Good Practice in Decision making. London
General Medical Council: 2004, Briefing on the Mental Capacity Bill. London, 7 Oct 2004. Online at http://www.gmcpressoffice.org.uk/apps/news/mediabrief/detail.php?key=75 (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Goodman M.D., M. Tarnoff, G.J. Slotman: 1998, Effect of Advance Directives on the Management of Elderly Critically Ill Patients. Critical Care Medicine 26(4), 701–704
Hawkins N.A., P.H. Ditto, J.H. Danks, W.D. Smucker: 2005, Micromanaging Death: Process Preferences, Values, and goals in End-of-life Medical Decision Making. Gerontologist 45(1), 107–117
Kennedy I., A. Grubb: 2000, Medical Law, 3rd edition. London: Butterworths
Kish Wallace S., C.G. Martin, A.D. Shaw, K.J. Price: 2001, Influence of an Advance Directive on the Initiation of Life Support Technology in Critically Ill Cancer Patients. Critical Care Medicine 29(12), 2294–2298
Lang F., T. Quill: 2004, Making Decisions with Families at the End of Life. American Family Physician 70(4), 719–723
Making Decisions Alliance: 2005, Making Decisions Alliance Welcomes Introduction of the Mental Capacity Act. London: Press release 8 April 2005, online at http://www.makingdecisions.org.uk/news_release_04_05.htm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Malloy T.R., R.S. Wigton, J. Meeske, T.G. Tape: 1992, The Influence of Treatment Descriptions on Advance Medical Directive Decisions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 40(12), 1255–1260
Mazur D.J., J.F. Merz: 1993, How the Manner of Presentation of Data Influences Older Patients in Determining Their Treatment Preferences. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 41(3), 223–228
Michalowski S.: 2005, Advance Refusals of Life-sustaining Medical Treatment: the Relativity of an Absolute Right. Modern Law Review 68(6), 958–982
Miller B.: 1995, Autonomy, In: W.T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 5th edition. London: Prentice Hall International, pp. 215–220
Morrison R.S., E. Olson, K.R. Mertz, D.E. Meier: 1995, The Inaccessibility of Advance Directives on Transfer from Ambulatory to Acute Care Settings. JAMA 274(6), 478–482
Murphy D.J., D. Burrows, S. Santilli, A.W. Kemp, S. Tenner, B. Kreling, J. Teno: 1994, The influence of the probability of survival on patients’ preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The New England Journal of Medicine 330(8), 545–549
Prendergast T.J.: 2001, Advance Care Planning: Pitfalls, Progress, Promise. Critical Care Medicine 29(2 Suppl), N34–N39
Probst M., B. Knittel: 2001, Gesetzliche Vertretung durch Angehörige – Alternative zur Betreuung? ZRP 2, 55–60
Puchalski C.M., Z. Zhong, M.M. Jacobs, E. Fox, J. Lynn, J. Harrold, A. Galanos, R.S. Phillips, R. Califf, J.M. Teno: 2000, Patients Who Want Their Family and Physician to Make Resuscitation Decisions for Them: Observations From SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 48(5 Suppl), 84–90
Sahm S., R. Will, G. Hommel: 2005, Attitudes Towards and Barriers to Writing Advance Directives Amongst Cancer Patients, Healthy Controls, and Medical Staff, Journal of Medical Ethics 31(8), 437–440
Seale C.: 2006, Characteristics of End-of-life Decisions: Survey of UK Medical Practitioners. Palliative Medicine 20(7), 653–659
Sehgal A., A. Galbraith, M. Chesney, P. Schoenfeld, G. Charles, B. Lo: 1992, How Strictly do Dialysis Patients Want Their Advance Directives Followed? JAMA 267(1), 59–63
Shalowitz D.I., E. Garrett-Mayer, D. Wendler: 2006, The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision-makers: A Systematic Review. Archives of Internal Medicine 166(5), 493–497
Strätling, M., H. Strätling-Tölle, V.E. Scharf, P. Schmucker: 2003, „Automatische“ gesetzliche Stellvertretung nicht entscheidungsfähiger Patienten durch „nahe Angehörige“? MedR, 21(7), 372–379
Teno J., J. Lynn, N. Wenger, R.S. Phillips, D.P. Murphy, A.F. Connors Jr., N. Desbiens, W. Fulkerson, P. Bellamy, W.A. Knaus: 1997a, Advance Directives for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: Effectiveness with the Patient Self-determination Act and the SUPPORT Intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(4), 500–507
Teno J.M., S. Licks, J. Lynn, N. Wenger, A.F. Connors Jr., R.S. Phillips, M.A. O’Connor, D.P. Murphy, W.J. Fulkerson, N. Desbiens, W.A. Knaus: 1997b, Do Advance Directives Provide Instructions that Direct Care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(4), 508–512
Treloar, A.: 2004, ‹The Mental Capacity Bill – Gateway to Euthanasia?’ Triple Helix Autumn, 6–7. Online at http://www.cmf.org.uk/literature/content.asp?context=article&id=1273 (accessed on 7 Feb 2007)
Vossler, N.: 2003, Gesetzliche Vertretungsmacht für Angehörige – Eine Alternative zur Betreuung? Eine Erwiderung auf Probst/Knittel. BtPRAX 1, 6–11
English and American legal sources
Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] AC 789 (HL)
American Medical Directors Association: 2007, White Paper on Surrogate Decision making and Advance Care Planning in Long-Term Care. Online at http://www.amda.com/governance/whitepapers/surrogate/surrogate.cfm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Butler v. Freeman [1756] Amb. 302
Children Act 1989, In M.A. Jones, A.E. Morris (eds.), Statues on Medical Law, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Department for Constitutional Affairs: 2003, Draft Mental Incapacity Bill. London: Cm 5859-I & II. Online at http://www.dca.gov.uk/menincap/meninc.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Department for Constitutional Affairs: 2006, Mental Capacity Act 2005 Draft Code of Practice. Online at http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/codepractise/codeofpractice.htm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Enduring Powers of Attorney Act 1985. London: The Stationery Office
F. v. West Berkshire H.A. [1990] 2 A.C. 1
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986] AC 112
House of Lords: 2005, ‹Mental Capacity Bill’, Hansard 671, columns 412–459
Law Commission: 1989, Report No. 185: Fourth Programme of Law Reform. London: The Stationery Office Cm 800
Law Commission: 1995, Report No. 231: Mental Incapacity. London: The Stationery Office HC 189
Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). London: Office of Public Sector Information. Online at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050009.htm (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Patient Self-Determination Act 1990 (as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act 1990). Washington: Pub. L. No. 101–508
Presidents’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1989, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington D.C.: The Commission/G.P.O
R (Burke) v. General Medical Council [2005] 2 WLR 431
Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) [2000] 1 FCR 193
Re AK (Medical Treatment: Consent) [2001] 1 FLR 129
Re C (Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 All ER 819 (Fam Div)
Re MB (Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FLR 426 (CA)
Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation) [2001] Fam 15
Re S (Sterilisation) [2000] 2 FLR 389
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 (CA)
R (on the application of Burke) v. General Medical Council [2005] EWCA Civ 1003
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 NY 125 (1914)
W Healthcare NHS Trust v. H [2005] 1 WLR 834
German legal sources
Bosbach, W. et al.: 2007, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Verankerung der Patientenverfügung im Betreuungsrecht. Online at http://wobo.de/home/downloads/ge_patientenverf_endfass_15.05.07.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (= BGB): 2007. Berlin: Bundesministerium der Justiz, online at http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/index.html (accessed on 11 August 2007)
Bundesgerichtshof: 1994, BGHSt 40, 257 (263) = BGH 1 StR 357/94, 13 September 1994
Bundesgerichtshof: 2003, BGHZ 154, 205 (217) = XII ZB 2/03, 17 March 2003
Bundesministerium der Justiz: 2004, Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe „Patientenautonomie am Lebensende“, http://www.bmj.bund.de/media/archive/695.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Bundesverfassungsgericht: 2001, BVerfG NJW 2002, 206 = 1 BvR 618/93, 2 August 2001
Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgruppe „Betreuungsrecht“: 2003, Abschlussbericht zur 74. Konferenz der Justizmininsterinnen und -minister. (11–12 June 2003), online at http://www.dnoti.de/DOC/2005/abschlussbericht.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Enquete-Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages: 2004, „Ethik und Recht der modernen Medizin“, Zwischebericht Patientenverfügungen, Drucksache 15/3700, online at http://dip.bundestag.de/parfors/parfors.htm (accessed 11 Aug 2007)
Stünker, J. et al.: 2007, Entwurf eines 3. Gesetzes zur Änderung des Betreuungsrechts. Online at http://www.user.gwdg.de/~ukee/ge_pv_stuenker_juni07.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Zöller, W. et al.: 2007, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Klarstellung der Verbindlichkeit von Patientenverfügungen. Online at http://www.wolfgang-zoeller.de/upload/CY61b735f9X113480594d5X101/2101282730_Gesetzentwurf_Patientenverfuegung.pdf (accessed on 11 Aug 2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jox, R.J., Michalowski, S., Lorenz, J. et al. Substitute decision making in medicine: comparative analysis of the ethico-legal discourse in England and Germany. Med Health Care Philos 11, 153–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9112-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9112-0