Abstract
Ethical guidelines commonly state that research subjects should have a right to withdraw consent to participate. According to the guidelines we have studied, this right applies also to research on biological samples. However, research conducted on human subjects themselves differs in important respects from research on biological samples. It is therefore not obvious that the same rights should be granted research participants in the two cases. This paper investigates arguments for and against granting a right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples. We conclude that (1) there are no explicit arguments for such a right in the guidelines we have studied, (2) the arguments against such a right are inconclusive, (3) considerations of autonomy, privacy, personal integrity, and trust in medical research provide sufficient reasons for granting a right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples, (4) in certain cases, research participants should be allowed to waive this right.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Brock (1993) ‘Informed Consent’ D. Brock (Eds) Life and Death. Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics Cambridge University Press Cambridge 21–54
CIOMS: 2002, International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva.
Council of Europe: 1997, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo.
Council of Europe: 1996, Explanatory Report to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.
J. Dahl Rendtorff (2001) ‘Biobanks and the Rights to the Human Body’ M.G. Hansson (Eds) The Use of Human Biobanks. Ethical. Social. Economical and Legal Aspects Uppsala University Uppsala 55–60
R. Doll (2001) ArticleTitle‘Research will be Impeded’(Contribution to a debate: What are the effects of the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki) British Medical Journal 323 1421–1422
R. Faden T. Beauchamp (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent Oxford University Press Oxford
R. Macklin (2003) ArticleTitle‘Dignity is a Useless Concept. It Means no more than Respect for Persons or their Autonomy’ British Medical Journal 327 1419–1420 Occurrence Handle14684633
O. O’Neill (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
A. Persson (2003) ‘Gifts and Donations’ M.G. Hansson M. Levin (Eds) Biobanks as Resources for Health Uppsala University Uppsala 227–254
UNESCO: 2003, International Declaration on Human Genetic Data.
D. Wendler (2002) ArticleTitle‘What Research with Stored Samples Teaches Us about Research with Human Subjects’ Bioethics 16 33–54 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8519.00266 Occurrence Handle12061383
World Medical Association: 2000, Declaration of Helsinki, adopted by the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helgesson, G., Johnsson, L. The Right to Withdraw Consent to Research on Biobank Samples. Med Health Care Philos 8, 315–321 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0397-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0397-6