Abstract
Kantian deontology is one of three classic moral theories, among virtue ethics and consequentialism. Issues in medical ethics are frequently addressed within a Kantian paradigm, at least – although not exclusively – in European medical ethics. At the same time, critical voices have pointed to deficits of Kantian moral philosophy which must be examined and discussed. It is argued that taking concrete situations and complex relationships into account is of paramount importance in medical ethics. Encounters between medical or nursing staff and patients are rarely symmetrical relationships between autonomous and rational agents. Kantian ethics, the criticism reads, builds on the lofty ideal of such a relationship. In addition to the charge of an individualist and rationalist focus on autonomy, Kantian ethics has been accused of excluding those not actually in possession of these properties or of its rigorism. It is said to be focussed on laws and imperatives to an extent that it cannot appreciate the complex nuances of real conflicts. As a more detailed analysis will show, these charges are inadequate in at least some regards. This will be demonstrated by drawing on the Kantian notion of autonomy, the role of maxims and judgment and the conception of duties, as well as the role of emotions. Nevertheless the objections brought forward against Kantian moral theory can help determine, with greater precision, its strengths and shortcomings as an approach to current problems in medical ethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. C. Baier (1995) The Need for More than Justice Virginia Held (Eds) Justice and Care. Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics Harper Collins Boulder, CO 47–58
R. Baumann-Hölzle (1999) Autonomie und Freiheit in der Medizinethik. Immanuel Kant und Karl Barth Alber Freiburg/München
T.L. Beauchamp J.F. Childress (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics EditionNumber5 Oxford University Press Oxford
J.P. Beckmann (1998) ArticleTitle‘Patientenverfügungen: Autonomie und Selbstbestimmung vor dem Hintergrund eines im Wandel begriffenen Arzt-Patient-Verhältnisses’ Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 44 IssueID2 143–156
S. Benhabib (1998) The Generalized and The Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Moral Theory E.F. Kittay D.T. Meyers (Eds) Women and Moral Theory Rowman and Littlefield Totowa, NJ 154–177
N. Biller-Andorno (2001) Gerechtigkeit und Fürsorge Campus Frankfurt a.M./New York
R. Brandt (2001) Philosophie Eine Einführung Philipp Reclam jun. Stuttgart 191
A.L. Carse (1998) ArticleTitle‘Impartial Principle and Moral Context: Securing a Place for the Particular in Ethical Theory’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 IssueID2 153–169 Occurrence Handle10.1076/jmep.23.2.153.8923 Occurrence Handle9638567
U. Eibach (1997) ArticleTitle‘Vom Paternalismus zur Autonomie des Patienten? Medizinische Ethik im Spannungsfeld zwischen einer Ethik der Fürsorge und einer Ethik der Autonmie’ Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ethik 43 215–231
T.H. Engelhardt (1996) The Foundations of Bioethics EditionNumber2 Oxford University Press Oxford/New York
Flanagan, O.J. Jr., J.E.: 1983, ‘Impartiality and Particularity’, Social Research 50 (3), 576–596.
R.M. Green (2001) ArticleTitle‘What Does it Mean to Use Someone as ”A Means Only”: Rereading Kant’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 IssueID3 247–262 Occurrence Handle11700682
Gregor, M.J.: 1996, Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Translated und edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge University Press. (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant).
B. Herman (1993) The Practice of Moral Judgement Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
O. Höffe (1979) Ethik und Politik Suhrkamp Frankfurt a.M. 86–93
Kant, Immanuel: Kants Gesammelte Schriften, edited by the Royal Prussian (later German) Academy of Sciences. Berlin, Georg Reimer, later Walter deGruyter & Co., 1900-).–Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals in vol. 4; Critique of practical reason in vol. 5; The metaphysics of morals in vol. 6; Toward perpetual peace in vol. 8.
L. Kordelas C. Grond-Ginsbach (2000) ArticleTitle‘Kant über die ”moralische Waghälsigkeit der Pockenimpfung’ International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 8 22–33
H. Nagl-Docekal (1993) Jenseits der Geschlechtermoral. Eine Einführung H. Nagl-Docekal H. Pauer-Studer (Eds) Jenseits der Geschlechtermoral. Beiträge zur feministischen Ethik. Fischer Frankfurt a.M. 7–32
H.L. Nelson (1997) Introduction H.L. Nelson (Eds) Stories and Their Limits–Narrative Approaches to Bioethics Routledge New York and London
O. O’Neill (1993) ‘Einverständnis und Verletzbarkeit: Eine Neubewertung von Kants Begriff der Achtung für Personen’ H. Nagl-Docekal H. Pauer-Studer (Eds) Jenseits der Geschlechtermoral. Beiträge zur feministischen Ethik Frankfurt a.M. Fischer 335–367
O.: O’Neill (2003) ArticleTitleAutonomy: 2003, ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes’ Supplement to the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77 IssueID1 1–21 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8349.00100
H. Pauer-Studer (1996) Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Moraltheorie im Kontext der Geschlechterdifferenz Akademie-Verlag Berlin
B. Schöne-Seifert (1996) Medizinethik J. Nida-Rümelin (Eds) Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung Kröner Stuttgart 552–648
N. Sherman (1990) ‘The Place of Emotions in Kantian Morality’ O. Flanagan O. Rorty Amélie (Eds) Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology MIT Press Cambridge, MA 149–170
K. Steigleder (2002) Kants Moralphilosophie. Die Selbstbezüglichkeit reiner praktischer Vernunft Metzler Stuttgart/Weimar
L. Thomas (1990) ‘Trust, Affirmation, and Moral Character: A Critique of Kantian Morality’ O. Flanagan O. Rorty Amélie (Eds) Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology MIT Press Cambridge, MA 235–257
S. Hooft Particlevan (1996) ArticleTitle‘Bioethics and caring’ Journal of Medical Ethics 22 83–89 Occurrence Handle8731533
B.C. White (1994) Competence to Consent Georgetown University Press Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heubel, F., Biller-Andorno, N. The contribution of Kantian moral theory to contemporary medical ethics: A critical analysis. Med Health Care Philos 8, 5–18 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0104-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-0104-7