Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The individual patient and evidence-based medicine – a conflict?

  • REVIEW TOPIC: EVIDENCE-BASED SURGERY
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

The doctor–patient relationship is characterised by clinical situations that reflect different degrees of impairment of the patient’s quality of life on the one hand and different degrees of threat to the patient’s life on the other. Typical patterns of these situations from absent or minimal to severe impairment of well being or threat to life are described. With regard to this, the doctor–patient communication is still suffering from considerable deficits. For the latter, a possible philosophical framework and reason is given. The potential of evidence-based medicine to ease this conflict by bringing into the game the current best-available scientific evidence is discussed, and some inherent serious limitations of evidence-based medicine are shown. Besides these drawbacks, doctors are usually very reluctant and lazy to integrate evidence-based results into their daily practice. In the author’s view, evidence-based medicine is a reasonably new tool. However, it should not yet be overestimated in its potential to influence and improve daily clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 9 March 1999 Accepted: 2 September 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eypasch, E. The individual patient and evidence-based medicine – a conflict?. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 384, 417–422 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004230050224

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004230050224

Navigation