Skip to main content
Log in

The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care

  • Legal and Ethical Issues
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To critically analyze physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care.

Methods

An ethical analysis of factors contributing to physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making.

Results

There is variability in decision-making about life support, both within and between intensive care units. Physician age, race, religion, attitude to risk, and personality factors have been associated with decisions to provide or limit life-sustaining treatment, though it is unclear how much these factors affect patient outcome. Inconsistency in decision-making appears worryingly arbitrary, and may mean that patients’ values are sometimes being ignored or overridden. However, physician influence on decisions may also sometimes be appropriate and unavoidable, particularly where patient values are unclear.

Conclusions

We argue that, although physician-related variability in end-of-life care can never be eliminated entirely, it is potentially ethically problematic. We outline four potential strategies for reducing the “roster lottery.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wennberg JE (2011) Time to tackle unwarranted variations in practice. BMJ 342:687–690. doi:10.1136/bmj.d1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frost D, Cook D, Heyland D, Fowler R (2011) Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 39:1174–1189. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eacf2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azoulay E, Metnitz B, Sprung CL, Timsit JF, Lemaire F, Bauer P, Schlemmer B, Moreno R, Metnitz P (2009) End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med 35:623–630. doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1310-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woodcock T (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus study. JAMA 290:790–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lofmark R, Nilstun T, Cartwright C, Fischer S, van der Heide A, Mortier F, Norup M, Simonato L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, EURELD Consortium (2008) Physicians’ experiences with end-of-life decision-making: survey in 6 European countries and Australia. BMC Med 6:4. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-6-4

  6. de Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, Berbik I, Hansen G, Kucinskas A, Lenoir S, Levin A, Persson J, Rebagliato M, Reid M, Schroell M, de Vonderweid U, EURONIC study group (2000) Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr 137:608–616

    Google Scholar 

  7. Randolph AG, Zollo MB, Egger MJ, Guyatt GH, Nelson RM, Stidham GL (1999) Variability in physician opinion on limiting pediatric life support. Pediatrics 103:e46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Needle JS, Mularski RA, Nguyen T, Fromme EK (2012) Influence of personal preferences for life-sustaining treatment on medical decision making among pediatric intensivists. Crit Care Med 40:2464–2469. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d85b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnato AE, Hsu HE, Bryce CL, Lave JR, Emlet LL, Angus DC, Arnold RM (2008) Using simulation to isolate physician variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer: a pilot feasibility study. Crit Care Med 36:3156–3163. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818f40d2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gresiuk CS, Joffe AR (2011) Variability in the pediatric intensivists’ threshold for withdrawal/limitation of life support as perceived by bedside nurses: a multicenter survey study. Ann Intensive Care 1:31. doi:10.1186/2110-5820-1-31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Larochelle MR, Rodriguez KL, Arnold RM, Barnato AE (2009) Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensity. Palliat Med 23:460–470. doi:10.1177/0269216309103664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poulton B, Ridley S, Mackenzie-Ross R, Rizvi S (2005) Variation in end-of-life decision making between critical care consultants. Anaesthesia 60:1101–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garland A, Connors AF (2007) Physicians’ influence over decisions to forego life support. J Palliat Med 10:1298–1305. doi:10.1089/jpm.2007.0061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sprung CL, Maia P, Bulow HH, Ricou B, Armaganidis A, Baras M, Wennberg E, Reinhart K, Cohen SL, Fries DR, Nakos G, Thijs LG (2007) The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 33:1732–1739. doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0693-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catlin AJ (2010) Variability in the limitation of life support in pediatrics continues. J Clin Ethics 20:327–329

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garland A, Shaman Z, Baron J, Connors AF Jr (2006) Physician-attributable differences in intensive care unit costs: a single-center study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:1206–1210. doi:10.1164/rccm.200511-1810OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. White DB, Brody B (2011) Would accommodating some conscientious objections by physicians promote quality in medical care? JAMA 305:1804–1805. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lantos JD, Meadow W (2009) Variation in the treatment of infants born at the borderline of viability. Pediatrics 123:1588–1590. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schenker Y, Tiver GA, Hong SY, White DB (2012) Association between physicians’ beliefs and the option of comfort care for critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 38:1607–1615. doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2671-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Epstein RM, Peters E (2009) Beyond information: exploring patients’ preferences. JAMA 302:195–197. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brush DR, Rasinski KA, Hall JB, Alexander GC (2012) Recommendations to limit life support: a national survey of critical care physicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186:633–639. doi:10.1164/rccm.201202-0354OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kon AA (2010) The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 304:903–904. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Downey L, Au DH, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA (2012) Life-sustaining treatment preferences: matches and mismatches between patients’ preferences and clinicians’ perceptions. J Pain Symp Manag. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.002

    Google Scholar 

  24. Madrigal VN, Carroll KW, Hexem KR, Faerber JA, Morrison WE, Feudtner C (2012) Parental decision-making preferences in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 40:2876–2882. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825b9151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45:941–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

D.J.C.W. was supported for this work by an early career fellowship from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1016641). The funder had no role in the research or in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic J. C. Wilkinson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 113 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 56 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkinson, D.J.C., Truog, R.D. The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 39, 1128–1132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2871-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2871-6

Keywords

Navigation