Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple publication of reports of drug trials

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Fourty-four multiple publications of 31 comparative trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis were examined for mutual agreement. Thirty-two of the papers were published in the same language as the primary version. Important discrepancies were seen in 14 trials, involving description of the study design in two, exclusion of protocol violators in two, inconsistency in the number of effect variables in five, in the number of side-effects in five, and in the significance level in one. In three articles the conclusion became more favourable for the new drug with time.

Only half of the trials had the same first author and number of authors. For six trials, multiple publication was difficult to detect.

Adherence to the manuscript guidelines published by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors should diminish the risk of inflated meta-analyses, reference lists and curricula vitae, and inexplicable discrepancies in articles based on the same data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1988) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Br Med J 296: 401–405

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gøtzsche PC (1987) Reference bias in reports of drug trials. Br Med J 295: 654–656

    Google Scholar 

  3. Institute for Scientific Information. Science Citation Index. Journal Citation Reports (1986) ISI, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gøtzsche PC (1989) Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Controlled Clin Trials 10: 31–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Assenzo JR, Lamborn KR (1981) Documenting the results of a study. In: Buncher CR, Jia-Yeong T (eds) Statistics in the pharmaceutical industry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 251–299

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mosteller F (1979) Problems of omission in communications. Clin Pharmacol Ther 25: 761–764

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lock S (1984) Repetitive publication: A waste that must stop. Br Med J 288: 661–662

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fulginiti VA (1985) Unfortunately, more on duplicate publication. Am J Dis Child 139: 865–866

    Google Scholar 

  9. Editor's Note (1985) Notice of duplicate publication. J Am Med Assoc 254: 3423

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curfman GD (1987) Duplicate publication on postmenopausal bone loss. N Engl J Med 317: 833–834

    Google Scholar 

  11. Editorial (1969) Definition of “sole contribution” N Engl J Med 281: 676–677

  12. Relman AS (1981) The Ingelfinger rule. N Engl J Med 305: 824–826

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gøtzsche, P.C. Multiple publication of reports of drug trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36, 429–432 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00558064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00558064

Key words

Navigation