Article Text
Abstract
Psychiatric genomics research protocols are increasingly incorporating tools of deep phenotyping to observe and examine phenotypic abnormalities among individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. In particular, photography and the use of two-dimensional and three-dimensional facial analysis is thought to shed further light on the phenotypic expression of the genes underlying neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as provide potential diagnostic tools for clinicians. In this paper, I argue that the research use of photography to aid facial phenotyping raises deeply fraught issues from an ethical point of view. First, the process of objectification through photographic imagery and facial analysis could potentially worsen the stigmatisation of persons with neurodevelopmental disorders. Second, the use of photography for facial phenotyping has worrying parallels with the historical misuse of photography to advance positive and negative eugenics around race, ethnicity and intellectual disability. The paper recommends ethical caution in the use of photography and facial phenotyping in psychiatric genomics studies exploring neurodevelopmental disorders, outlining certain necessary safeguards, such as a critical awareness of the history of anthropometric photography use among scientists, as well as the exploration of photographic methodologies that could potentially empower individuals with disabilities.
- research ethics
- psychiatry
- mentally ill and disabled persons
- genethics
- disabilities
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was first published online. Two citations were incorrect and correction directions were left in text. This has now been amended
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
- Concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Digital assessment of the fetal alcohol syndrome facial phenotype: reliability and agreement study
- When the face says it all: dysmorphology in identifying syndromic causes of epilepsy
- Refining nosology by modelling variation among facial phenotypes: the RASopathies
- Validation of a clinical screening instrument for tumour predisposition syndromes in patients with childhood cancer (TuPS): protocol for a prospective, observational, multicentre study
- Deep learning-based facial image analysis in medical research: a systematic review protocol
- Neurodevelopmental disorders associated with dosage imbalance of ZBTB20 correlate with the morbidity spectrum of ZBTB20 candidate target genes
- Deletions and de novo mutations of SOX11 are associated with a neurodevelopmental disorder with features of Coffin–Siris syndrome
- Bigiswun Kid Project: a longitudinal study of adolescents living with high rates of prenatal alcohol exposure, fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and early life trauma in remote Australian Aboriginal communities
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype–phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: addition of 67 new patients
- Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics