Table 2

Multivariable logistic regression of associations with support for the notion of rational suicide

VariableFrequency (%)Crude OR (95% CI)Corrected OR (95% CI)
Gender
 Male247 (68)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Female112 (31)0.87 (0.53 to 1.43)1.07 (0.61 to 1.89)
Specialty
 GP181 (50)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Medical88 (24)1.01 (0.58 to 1.77)0.84 (0.45 to 1.58)
 Surgical47 (13)1.00 (0.50 to 2.02)0.93 (0.41 to 2.11)
 Psychiatry28 (8)3.54 (1.03 to 12.23)1.69 (0.43 to 6.61)
 Other19 (5)2.27 (0.63 to 8.10)0.67 (0.15 to 3.05)
How religious
 1 Min111 (31)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 2119 (33)0.48 (0.25 to 0.92)0.65 (0.32 to 1.29)
 398 (27)0.36 (0.19 to 0.70)0.44 (0.21 to 0.89)
 4 Max27 (7)0.24 (0.10 to 0.60)0.28 (0.10 to 0.76)
Care for dying
 Daily29 (8)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 >Weekly75 (21)0.72 (0.26 to 2.02)0.93 (0.30 to 2.84)
 >Monthly112 (31)0.62 (0.23 to 1.67)0.65 (0.22 to 1.86)
 >Yearly71 (20)0.40 (0.14 to 1.11)0.34 (0.11 to 1.02)
 <Yearly37 (10)0.70 (0.22 to 2.24)0.67 (0.18 to 2.42)
 Never35 (10)4.30 (0.80 to 23.25)3.34 (0.55 to 20.33)
Physician assisted dying
 Agree139 (38)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Neither43 (12)0.24 (0.11 to 0.53)0.24 (0.11 to 0.56)
 Disagree177 (49)0.30 (0.17 to 0.53)0.35 (0.18 to 0.67)
  • The crude estimates are calculated on the denominators detailed in table 1. The adjusted estimates are on the 348 (96%) participants who had complete data for all the variables. Bold type indicates P<0.05.

  • GP, general practitioner.