Code | Reason | Sub-category | N | % |
1 | Honest error | (a) based on incorrect/fraudulent* data | 10 | 28 |
(b) research error (eg, wrong cell line) | 44 | |||
(c) calculation error/inaccurate data | 33 | |||
2 | Could not replicate findings | (a) same authors | 31 | 11 |
(b) different authors | 4 | |||
3 | Journal (administrative) error | 3 | 1 | |
4 | Redundant publication | (a) complete (ie, duplicate/triplicate publication) | 34 | 17 |
(b) partial (ie, overlapping publications) | 20 | |||
5 | Plagiarism | Amount unspecified | 6 | 16 |
(a) total (ie, whole paper copied) | 4 | |||
(b) partial—data only | 7 | |||
(c) partial—text only | 18 | |||
(d) partial—data and text | 14 | |||
6 | Data used without permission/author dispute | 17 | 5 | |
7 | Fabricated data | 16 | 5 | |
8 | Falsified data | 13 | 4 | |
9 | Ethical problems with research | 4 | 1 | |
10 | Misconduct (unspecified) | 10 | 2 | |
11 | Inaccurate/misleading reporting | 12 | 4 | |
12 | No reason/unclear | 17 | 5 |
* For example, calculations based on published work by another group that later turned out to be fraudulent, therefore the inclusion of the fraudulent data was an honest error on the part of the second group of researchers.