Table 2

 Characteristics of patients (a) with and without capacity as assessed by the two methods (AC v BC) and (b) entering the study by the two methods (ACC v BCC, three patients with relative assent excluded)

ACBCAC v BCACCBCCACC v BCC
*Equal variances not assumed.
CAM, Confusion Assessment Method; DRS, Delirium Rating Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental Status Examination; RCDS, Reversible Cognitive Dysfunction Scale.
No. of patients34632254
Mean (SD) age, years81.6 (6.1)84.2 (6.8)t = 1.85, df = 95; p = 0.06880.6 (6.1)83.8 (6.6)t = 1.96, df = 74; p = 0.053
Men (%)44.142.9NS40.944.4NS
Case note diagnosis of delirium (%)27.023.5NS22.729.6NS
Mean (SD) length of stay, days20.6 (19.0)18.9 (16.1)NS18.9 (15.5)20.4 (16.8)NS
Died in hospital (%)8.89.5NS9.19.3NS
Survivors discharged to nursing home (%)18.822.2NS528.6χ2 = 4.64, df1 p = 0.03
Declining to participate (%)35.314.3χ2 = 5.75; p = 0.017
Mean initial MMSE (possible 30–0)21.0 (6.2)16.7 (8.6)t = −2.46, df = 53; p = 0.017*
Mean initial RCDS (possible 0–53)10.9 (8.5)17.3 (12.5)t = 2.54, df = 72.5; p = 0.0142
Mean initial DRS (possible 0–32)4.4 (3.4)7.8 (7.3)t = 2.73, df = 72.5; p = 0.0082
Mean final DRS3.6 (4.2)6.7 (7.3)t = 2.25, df = 64.8; p = 0.0282
Mean DRS over all assessments4.0 (3.2)7.3 (6.8)t = 2.86, df = 72.1; p = 0.0062
Initially CAM positive (%)13.633.3χ2 = 3.03; p = 0.08