PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Göttert, Elena Ana Francesca TI - What is fair? Ethical analysis of triage criteria and disability rights during the COVID-19 pandemic and the German legislation AID - 10.1136/jme-2023-109326 DP - 2023 Nov 16 TA - Journal of Medical Ethics PG - jme-2023-109326 4099 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2024/01/22/jme-2023-109326.short 4100 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2024/01/22/jme-2023-109326.full AB - This essay discusses the ethical challenges and dilemmas in allocating scarce medical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic, using the German legislative process as a starting point. It is guided by the right to non-discrimination of people with disability and generally contrasts utilitarian and rights-based principles of allocation. Three approaches that were suggested in the German discussion, are presented, the lottery principle, the first come first served principle and the probability to survive principle. Arguments in favour and against each principle are discussed. The focus is on the utilitarian probability to survive principle, which was adopted in German legislation in 2022, and its discriminatory potential against people with disability. The essay suggests ways to mitigate the concerns of discrimination related to the probability to survive principle. It concludes that resolving the triage dilemma requires a balanced approach between utilitarian and rights-based concerns, which promotes both maximising the number of patients surviving and the right not to be discriminated against and be treated equally. It calls for a further debate on how many ethical values such as equity, fairness and non-discrimination we are willing to sacrifice for a higher number of survivors and when we are willing to sacrifice survivors to secure ethical values.No data are available.