TY - JOUR T1 - Understanding the autonomy of adults with impaired capacity through dialogue JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics DO - 10.1136/jme-2023-109049 SP - jme-2023-109049 AU - Alistair Wardrope AU - Simon Bell AU - Daniel Blackburn AU - Jon Dickson AU - Markus Reuber AU - Traci Walker Y1 - 2023/05/22 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2023/05/22/jme-2023-109049.abstract N2 - Smajdor invites welcome interrogation of the distance between our philosophical justifications of how we engage people in decisions about healthcare or research, and the ways we do so.1 She notes the implicit elision made between autonomy and informed consent, and argues the latter alone cannot secure the former, proposing a more flexible approach.As researchers working with people with dementia (PwD), we share Smajdor’s reservations. We argue that an autonomy worthy of respect requires not just decision-making capacity, but also authenticity; the ability to determine for oneself what is good for oneself.2 Furthermore, our relationships support or undermine both capacity and authenticity, and autonomous expression manifests throughout evolving relationships. This invites us to view respect differently—as an ongoing conversation with another person, capable of holding values that may move us. In Smajdor’s terminology, it requires that we recognise them. We describe how we operationalise this in our research.Three broad arguments usually support respect for autonomy.2 One—owed to JS Mill—holds that permitting individuals free choice promotes utility of all, by helping them fulfil ideas of the good, demonstrating ‘experiments in living’. Another draws from Kant’s categorical imperative; its Formula of Humanity holds that the capacity to determine our own values gives us reason to act, and we ought, therefore, to treat others’ values with the respect we show our own. Lastly, many simply assume ‘liberal neutrality’—an intrinsic value in people being permitted to pursue the … ER -