TY - JOUR T1 - Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics DO - 10.1136/medethics-2022-108294 SP - medethics-2022-108294 AU - Steve Clarke Y1 - 2022/04/29 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/04/28/medethics-2022-108294.abstract N2 - Michael Robinson takes issue with an ‘argument from voluntariness’ made by several opponents of current practices for managing conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare, including Cantor, Stahl and Emanuel, and Schuklenk, whom he characterises as ‘non-accommodationists’. Here I argue that while Robinson is right to oppose the argument from voluntariness, he misunderstands current arrangements for managing CO in healthcare, and he misses the force of the non-accommodationist case against those arrangements. I also argue that despite what he says, Robinson is as much a proponent of reform of the management of CO in healthcare as are his non-accommodationist opponents. Additionally, I raise a concern about Robinson’s preferred approach to managing CO in healthcare. ER -