@article {Clarkemedethics-2022-108294, author = {Steve Clarke}, title = {Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson}, elocation-id = {medethics-2022-108294}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1136/medethics-2022-108294}, publisher = {Institute of Medical Ethics}, abstract = {Michael Robinson takes issue with an {\textquoteleft}argument from voluntariness{\textquoteright} made by several opponents of current practices for managing conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare, including Cantor, Stahl and Emanuel, and Schuklenk, whom he characterises as {\textquoteleft}non-accommodationists{\textquoteright}. Here I argue that while Robinson is right to oppose the argument from voluntariness, he misunderstands current arrangements for managing CO in healthcare, and he misses the force of the non-accommodationist case against those arrangements. I also argue that despite what he says, Robinson is as much a proponent of reform of the management of CO in healthcare as are his non-accommodationist opponents. Additionally, I raise a concern about Robinson{\textquoteright}s preferred approach to managing CO in healthcare.}, issn = {0306-6800}, URL = {https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/04/28/medethics-2022-108294}, eprint = {https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/04/28/medethics-2022-108294.full.pdf}, journal = {Journal of Medical Ethics} }