PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lisa Schölin
AU  - Moira Connolly
AU  - Graham Morgan
AU  - Laura Dunlop
AU  - Mayura Deshpande
AU  - Arun Chopra
TI  - Limits of remote working: the ethical challenges in conducting Mental Health Act assessments during COVID-19
AID  - 10.1136/medethics-2021-107273
DP  - 2021 Sep 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 603--607
VI  - 47
IP  - 9
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/47/9/603.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/47/9/603.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2021 Sep 01; 47
AB  - COVID-19 has created additional challenges in mental health services, including the impact of social distancing measures on care and treatment. For situations where a detention under mental health legislation is required to keep an individual safe, psychiatrists may consider whether to conduct an assessment in person or using video technology. The Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 does not stipulate that an assessment has to be conducted in person. Yet, the Code of Practice envisions that detention assessments would be conducted face to face in all circumstances. During the pandemic, the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland, a statutory body with a duty to promote best practice of the Act, has been asked whether it may be acceptable and indeed preferable for some assessments to be conducted via video technology. Where an assessment is needed to determine if a patient needs to be detained, and where there is a need for social distancing or the need for ‘shielding’, remote assessments may in some circumstances be preferable. In this article, we outline the modification of the Mental Welfare Commission’s previous outright rejection of virtual assessments as the pandemic progressed and discuss the ethical and legal issues the possibility of remote assessments has exposed. We also discuss the limits and when a virtual assessment is not considered ethical. As the pandemic moves from a state of emergency into a ‘new normal’ in psychiatric services during second, or subsequent, waves, the use and place (if any) of remote assessments for detention needs to be considered.There are no data in this work.