@article {Ploug629, author = {Thomas Ploug and S{\o}ren Holm}, title = {The {\textquoteleft}Expiry Problem{\textquoteright} of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it}, volume = {46}, number = {9}, pages = {629--631}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1136/medethics-2020-106117}, publisher = {Institute of Medical Ethics}, abstract = {In this response to Neil Manson{\textquoteright}s latest intervention in our debate about the best consent model for biobank research we show, contra Manson that the {\textquoteleft}expiry problem{\textquoteright} that affects broad consent models because of changes over time in methods, purposes, types of data used and governance structures is a real and significant problem. We further show that our preferred implementation of meta consent as a national consent platform solves this problem and is not subject to the cost and burden objections that Manson raises.}, issn = {0306-6800}, URL = {https://jme.bmj.com/content/46/9/629}, eprint = {https://jme.bmj.com/content/46/9/629.full.pdf}, journal = {Journal of Medical Ethics} }