PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Chiara Mannelli
TI  - Whose life to save? Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak
AID  - 10.1136/medethics-2020-106227
DP  - 2020 Jun 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 364--366
VI  - 46
IP  - 6
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/6/364.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/6/364.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2020 Jun 01; 46
AB  - After initially emerging in China, the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak has advanced rapidly. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently declared it a pandemic, with Europe becoming its new epicentre. Italy has so far been the most severely hit European country and demand for critical care in the northern region currently exceeds its supply. This raises significant ethical concerns, among which is the allocation of scarce resources. Professionals are considering the prioritisation of patients most likely to survive over those with remote chances, and this news has triggered an intense debate about the right of every individual to access healthcare. The proposed analysis suggests that the national emergency framework in which prioritisation criteria are currently enforced should not lead us to perceive scarce resources allocation as something new. From an ethical perspective, the novelty of the current emergency is not grounded in the devastating effects of scarce resources allocation, which is rife in recent and present clinical practice. Rather, it has to do with the extraordinarily high number of people who find themselves personally affected by the implications of scarce resources allocation and who suddenly realise that the principle of ‘equals should be treated equally’ may no longer be applicable. Along with the need to allocate appropriate additional financial resources to support the healthcare system, and thus to mitigate the scarcity of resources, the analysis insists on the relevance of a medical ethics perspective that does not place the burden of care and choice solely on physicians.