PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rose Glennerster AU - Nathan Hodson TI - Confused out of care: unanticipated consequences of a ‘Hostile Environment’ AID - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105634 DP - 2020 Mar 01 TA - Journal of Medical Ethics PG - 163--167 VI - 46 IP - 3 4099 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/3/163.short 4100 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/3/163.full SO - J Med Ethics2020 Mar 01; 46 AB - The UK’s 2014 Immigration Act aimed to create a ‘Hostile Environment’ for migrants to the UK. One aspect of this was the restriction of access to secondary care for overseas visitors to the UK, although it remains the case that everybody living in the UK has the legal right to access primary care. In this paper, we argue that the effects of this policy extend beyond secondary care, including preventing eligible people from registering with a General Practice (GP), although as an unintended consequence. This problem arises from misinterpretation of policy wording, misleading GP websites and gatekeeping behaviour from front-line staff, even though there are no grounds in the current guidelines or law to support this. Free access to primary healthcare among refugees and asylum seekers living in deprived populations is particularly important in protecting patient health, given the burden of ill-health in this population and the multiple barriers to accessing early intervention they face. The medical profession has a duty to communicate their rights to this patient group—their legal entitlement to access free healthcare, and the vital importance of doing so.