TY - JOUR T1 - Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 123 LP - 127 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105855 VL - 46 IS - 2 AU - Mary Kathleen Deutscher Heilman AU - Tracy J Trothen Y1 - 2020/02/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/2/123.abstract N2 - Conscientious objection has become a divisive topic in recent bioethics publications. Discussion has tended to frame the issue in terms of the rights of the healthcare professional versus the rights of the patient. However, a rights-based approach neglects the relational nature of conscience, and the impact that violating one’s conscience has on the care one provides. Using medical assistance in dying as a case study, we suggest that what has been lacking in the discussion of conscientious objection thus far is a recognition and prioritising of the relational nature of ethical decision-making in healthcare and the negative consequences of moral distress that occur when healthcare professionals find themselves in situations in which they feel they cannot provide what they consider to be excellent care. We propose that policies that respect the relational conscience could benefit our healthcare institutions by minimising the negative impact of moral distress, improving communication among team members and fostering a culture of ethical awareness. Constructive responses to moral distress including relational cultivation of moral resilience are urged. ER -