TY - JOUR T1 - Relationships help make life worth living JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 22 LP - 23 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105809 VL - 46 IS - 1 AU - Aaron Wightman AU - Benjamin S Wilfond AU - Douglas Diekema AU - Erin Paquette AU - Seema Shah Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/1/22.abstract N2 - Decisions regarding life-sustaining medical treatments for young children with profound disabilities can be extremely challenging for families and clinicians. In this study, Brick and colleagues1 surveyed adult residents of the UK about their attitudes regarding withdrawal of treatment using a series of vignettes of infants with varying levels of intellectual and physical disability, based on real and hypothetical cases.1 This is an interesting study on an important topic. We first highlight the limitations of using these survey data to inform public policy and then offer a different interpretation from the authors’ regarding their findings about the value the public appears to place on relational capacity.The authors asked members of the lay public to interpret a disabled child’s best interest in a series of vignettes. The respondents were 92% white; 59% were atheist or reported no religious affiliation. Though the authors note this lack of diversity as a limitation, we would add that this limitation is particularly problematic in this context. Minority views on this issue may differ significantly from the majority perspective. When the stakes are high (as is the case for questions about withdrawing life-sustaining therapy from infants over parental objections), use of public opinion data to directly inform policy requires, at a minimum, a representative sample reflecting both the true diversity of views within the public and a method to justly account for the alternate views of the minority.Even if the sampled population were more … ER -