TY - JOUR T1 - Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 7 LP - 15 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105639 VL - 46 IS - 1 AU - Claudia Brick AU - Guy Kahane AU - Dominic Wilkinson AU - Lucius Caviola AU - Julian Savulescu Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/46/1/7.abstract N2 - Background Decisions about withdrawal of life support for infants have given rise to legal battles between physicians and parents creating intense media attention. It is unclear how we should evaluate when life is no longer worth living for an infant. Public attitudes towards treatment withdrawal and the role of parents in situations of disagreement have not previously been assessed.Methods An online survey was conducted with a sample of the UK public to assess public views about the benefit of life in hypothetical cases similar to real cases heard by the UK courts (eg, Charlie Gard, Alfie Evans). We then evaluated these public views in comparison with existing ethical frameworks for decision-making.Results One hundred and thirty participants completed the survey. The majority (94%) agreed that an infant’s life may have no benefit when well-being falls below a critical level. Decisions to withdraw treatment were positively associated with the importance of use of medical resources, the infant’s ability to have emotional relationships, and mental abilities. Up to 50% of participants in each case believed it was permissible to either continue or withdraw treatment.Conclusion Despite the controversy, our findings indicate that in the most severe cases, most people agree that life is not worth living for a profoundly disabled infant. Our survey found wide acceptance of at least the permissibility of withdrawal of treatment across a range of cases, though also a reluctance to overrule parents’ decisions. These findings may be useful when constructing guidelines for clinical practice. ER -