PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Dove, Edward S
AU  - Chico, Vicky
AU  - Fay, Michael
AU  - Laurie, Graeme
AU  - Lucassen, Anneke M
AU  - Postan, Emily
TI  - Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
AID  - 10.1136/medethics-2018-105229
DP  - 2019 Aug 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 504--507
VI  - 45
IP  - 8
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/45/8/504.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/45/8/504.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2019 Aug 01; 45
AB  - This article investigates a high-profile and ongoing dilemma for healthcare professionals (HCPs), namely whether the existence of a (legal) duty of care to genetic relatives of a patient is a help or a hindrance in deciding what to do in cases where a patient’s genetic information may have relevance to the health of the patient’s family members. The English case ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and others considered if a duty of confidentiality owed to the patient and a putative duty of care to the patient’s close relatives could coexist in this context. This article examines whether embracing the concept of coexisting duties could enable HCPs to respect duties in line with their clinical judgement, thereby providing legal support and clarity to professionals to allow them to provide the best possible genetics service to both the patient and their family. We argue that these dual duties, framed as a novel, composite duty to consider the interests of genetic relatives, could allow HCPs to exercise and act on their professional judgements about the relative value of information to family members, without fears of liability for negligence or breach of confidence.