TY - JOUR T1 - Ethics of crisis sedation: questions of performance and consent JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 339 LP - 345 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2018-105285 VL - 45 IS - 5 AU - Nathan Emmerich AU - Bert Gordijn Y1 - 2019/05/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/45/5/339.abstract N2 - This paper focuses on the practice of injecting patients who are dying with a relatively high dose of sedatives in response to a catastrophic event that will shortly precipitate death, something that we term ‘crisis sedation.’ We first present a confabulated case that illustrates the kind of events we have in mind, before offering a more detailed account of the practice. We then comment on some of the ethical issues that crisis sedation might raise. We identify the primary value of crisis sedation as allowing healthcare professionals to provide some degree of reassurance to patients, their families and the professionals who are caring for them. Next we focus on the issue of informed consent. Finally, we ask whether continuous deep sedation might be preferable to crisis sedation in scenarios where potential catastrophic events can be anticipated. ER -