RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Objections still fail: a response to Faria
JF Journal of Medical Ethics
JO J Med Ethics
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics
SP 334
OP 335
DO 10.1136/medethics-2017-104586
VO 44
IS 5
A1 Arnason, Gardar
YR 2018
UL http://jme.bmj.com/content/44/5/334.abstract
AB In her reply to my critical assessment of objections to the Weatherall report’s justification of non-human primate (NHP) research, Catia Faria focuses on three objections which she entitles ‘the disanalogy’, ‘the utilitarian calculus’ and ‘species overlap’. Faria finds my assessment unconvincing, butI argue that the objections still fail.