TY - JOUR T1 - Dignitarian medical ethics JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 62 LP - 67 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2017-104467 VL - 44 IS - 1 AU - Linda Barclay Y1 - 2018/01/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/44/1/62.abstract N2 - Philosophers and bioethicists are typically sceptical about invocations of dignity in ethical debates. Many believe that dignity is essentially devoid of meaning: either a mere rhetorical gesture used in the absence of good argument or a faddish term for existing values like autonomy and respect. On the other hand, the patient experience of dignity is a substantial area of research in healthcare fields like nursing and palliative care. In this paper, it is argued that philosophers have much to learn from the concrete patient experiences described in healthcare literature. Dignity is conferred on people when they are treated as having equal status, something the sick and frail are often denied in healthcare settings. The importance of equal status as a unique value has been forcefully argued and widely recognised in political philosophy in the last 15 years. This paper brings medical ethics up to date with philosophical discussion about the value of equal status by developing an equal status conception of dignity. ER -