PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Levy, Neil TI - Nudges in a post-truth world AID - 10.1136/medethics-2017-104153 DP - 2017 Aug 01 TA - Journal of Medical Ethics PG - 495--500 VI - 43 IP - 8 4099 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/43/8/495.short 4100 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/43/8/495.full SO - J Med Ethics2017 Aug 01; 43 AB - Nudges—policy proposals informed by work in behavioural economics and psychology that are designed to lead to better decision-making or better behaviour—are controversial. Critics allege that they bypass our deliberative capacities, thereby undermining autonomy and responsible agency. In this paper, I identify a kind of nudge I call a nudge to reason, which make us more responsive to genuine evidence. I argue that at least some nudges to reason do not bypass our deliberative capacities. Instead, use of these nudges should be seen as appeals to mechanisms partially constitutive of these capacities, and therefore as benign (so far as autonomy and responsible agency are concerned). I sketch some concrete proposals for nudges to reason which are especially important given the apparent widespread resistance to evidence seen in recent political events.