TY - JOUR T1 - On complicity and compromise: a précis JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 269 LP - 269 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2015-103149 VL - 43 IS - 4 AU - Chiara Lepora AU - Robert E Goodin Y1 - 2017/04/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/43/4/269.abstract N2 - Complicity consists in one person contributing to someone else's wrongdoing. But there is a diverse cluster ways of being involved in another’s wrongdoing. For a ‘diagnosis by exclusion’, we first fix the meaning of complicity in contrast to that with which it is often wrongly conflated.Literally cooperating in wrongdoing with others, for instance, is more than complicity. Each and every cooperator is actually a co-principal in the wrong jointly committed; and each bears the full responsibility, shared with all co-principals, for the outcomes of that wrongdoing.Other sorts of involvement with wrongs committed by others amount to less than complicity because the involvement there is causally inert and hence does not actually contribute to the other’s wrongdoing at all. Pardoning wrongs wholly in the past may be like that. So too may be some cases of wilfully overlooking wrongs that others commit under one's very nose.Complicity is a very precise way of being involved in wrongdoing. Complicity consists in a secondary contribution of a causal (or potentially causal) sort to a wrong committed by someone else. That ‘contribution factor’ can be graded on many axes, in terms of how proximate, reversible or frequent the contribution was. Other things being equal, one is more complicit the … ER -