PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Paraskevas Vezyridis
AU  - Stephen Timmons
TI  - Dissenting from care.data: an analysis of opt-out forms
AID  - 10.1136/medethics-2016-103654
DP  - 2016 Dec 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 792--796
VI  - 42
IP  - 12
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/12/792.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/12/792.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2016 Dec 01; 42
AB  - Background Care.data was a programme of work led by NHS England for the extraction of patient-identifiable and coded information from general practitioner (GP) records for secondary uses. This study analyses the forms (on the websites of GP practices) which enabled patients to opt out.Methods Theoretical sampling and summative content analysis were used to collect and analyse dissent forms used by patients to opt out from care.data. Domains included basic information about the programme, types of objections and personal details required for identification purposes.Results One hundred opt-out forms were analysed. Fifty-four forms mentioned that this programme was run by NHS England. 81 forms provided two types of objections to data-sharing, and 15 provided only one objection. Only 26 forms mentioned that direct care would not be affected and 32 that patients maintain their right to opt back anytime. All but one of the opt-out forms we reviewed requested the name of the person wishing to opt out. 94 required a date of birth and 33 an NHS number. 82 required an address, 42 a telephone number and 7 an email address.Conclusions Numbers of patients (not) opting out should be treated with caution, because the variability of information provided and the varied options for dissent may have caused confusion among patients. To ensure that dissent is in accordance with individual preferences and moral values, we recommend that well-designed information material and standardised opt-out forms be developed for such data-sharing initiatives.