PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Peter Daniel Murray
AU  - Denise Esserman
AU  - Mark Randolph Mercurio
TI  - In what circumstances will a neonatologist decide a patient is not a resuscitation candidate?
AID  - 10.1136/medethics-2015-102941
DP  - 2016 Jul 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 429--434
VI  - 42
IP  - 7
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/7/429.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/7/429.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2016 Jul 01; 42
AB  - Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of practising neonatologists regarding the ethical permissibility of unilateral Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit.Study design An anonymous survey regarding the permissibility of unilateral DNAR orders for three clinical vignettes was sent to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Perinatal Medicine.Results There were 490 out of a possible 3000 respondents (16%). A majority (76%) responded that a unilateral DNAR decision would be permissible in cases for which survival was felt to be impossible. A minority (25%) responded ‘yes’ when asked if a unilateral DNAR order would be permissible based solely on neurological prognosis.Conclusions A majority of neonatologists believed unilateral DNAR decisions are ethically permissible if survival is felt to be impossible, but not permissible based solely on poor neurological prognosis. This has significant implications for clinical care.