RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Scientific and conceptual flaws of coercive treatment models in addiction
JF Journal of Medical Ethics
JO J Med Ethics
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics
SP 18
OP 21
DO 10.1136/medethics-2015-102910
VO 42
IS 1
A1 Susanne Uusitalo
A1 Yvette van der Eijk
YR 2016
UL http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/1/18.abstract
AB In conceptual debates on addiction, neurobiological research has been used to support the idea that addicted drug users lack control over their addiction-related actions. In some interpretations, this has led to coercive treatment models, in which, the purpose is to ‘restore’ control. However, neurobiological studies that go beyond what is typically presented in conceptual debates paint a different story. In particular, they indicate that though addiction has neurobiological manifestations that make the addictive behaviour difficult to control, it is possible for individuals to reverse these manifestations through their own efforts. Thus, addicted individuals should not be considered incapable of making choices voluntarily, simply on the basis that addiction has neurobiological manifestations, and coercive treatment models of addiction should be reconsidered in this respect.