PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Susanne Uusitalo
AU  - Yvette van der Eijk
TI  - Scientific and conceptual flaws of coercive treatment models in addiction
AID  - 10.1136/medethics-2015-102910
DP  - 2016 Jan 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 18--21
VI  - 42
IP  - 1
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/1/18.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/1/18.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2016 Jan 01; 42
AB  - In conceptual debates on addiction, neurobiological research has been used to support the idea that addicted drug users lack control over their addiction-related actions. In some interpretations, this has led to coercive treatment models, in which, the purpose is to ‘restore’ control. However, neurobiological studies that go beyond what is typically presented in conceptual debates paint a different story. In particular, they indicate that though addiction has neurobiological manifestations that make the addictive behaviour difficult to control, it is possible for individuals to reverse these manifestations through their own efforts. Thus, addicted individuals should not be considered incapable of making choices voluntarily, simply on the basis that addiction has neurobiological manifestations, and coercive treatment models of addiction should be reconsidered in this respect.