RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Does professional orientation predict ethical sensitivities? Attitudes of paediatric and obstetric specialists toward fetuses, pregnant women and pregnancy termination
JF Journal of Medical Ethics
JO J Med Ethics
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics
SP 117
OP 122
DO 10.1136/medethics-2012-101126
VO 40
IS 2
A1 Stephen D Brown
A1 Karen Donelan
A1 Yolanda Martins
A1 Sadath A Sayeed
A1 Christine Mitchell
A1 Terry L Buchmiller
A1 Kelly Burmeister
A1 Jeffrey L Ecker
YR 2014
UL http://jme.bmj.com/content/40/2/117.abstract
AB Background To determine (1) whether fetal care paediatric (FCP) and maternal–fetal medicine (MFM) specialists harbour differing attitudes about pregnancy termination for congenital fetal conditions, their perceived responsibilities to pregnant women and fetuses, and the fetus as a patient and (2) whether self-perceived primary responsibilities to fetuses and women and views about the fetus as a patient are associated with attitudes about clinical care. Methods Mail survey of 434 MFM and FCP specialists (response rates 60.9% and 54.2%, respectively). Results MFMs were more likely than FCPs to disagree with these statements (all p values<0.005): (1) ‘the presence of a fetal abnormality is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ (MFM : FCP—78.4% vs 63.5%); (2) ‘the effects that a child born with disabilities might have on marital and family relationships is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ (MFM : FCP—80.5% vs 70.2%); and (3) ‘the cost of healthcare for the future child is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ (MFM : FCP—73.5% vs 55.9%). 65% MFMs versus 47% FCPs disagreed that their professional responsibility is to focus primarily on fetal well-being (p<0.01). Specialists did not differ regarding the fetus as a separate patient. Responses about self-perceived responsibility to focus on fetal well-being were associated with clinical practice attitudes. Conclusions Independent of demographic and sociopolitical characteristics, FCPs and MFMs possess divergent ethical sensitivities regarding pregnancy termination, pregnant women and fetuses, which may influence clinical care.