TY - JOUR T1 - Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’ JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - e15 LP - e18 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2012-100958 VL - 39 IS - 5 AU - Anthony Wrigley Y1 - 2013/05/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/39/5/e15.abstract N2 - Two notable limitations exist on the use of personhood arguments in establishing moral status. Firstly, although the attribution of personhood may give us sufficient reason to grant something moral status, it is not a necessary condition. Secondly, even if a person is that which has the ‘highest’ moral status, this does not mean that any interests of a person are justifiable grounds to kill something that has a ‘lower’ moral status. Additional justification is needed to overcome a basic wrongness associated with killing something possessing moral status. There are clear arguments already available in this regard in the case of a foetus that are not available in the case of a newborn infant. Hence, there is scope to consistently hold that abortion may be permissible but that after-birth abortion may not be permissible. ER -