TY - JOUR T1 - Conscientious objection by Muslim students startling JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 708 LP - 708 DO - 10.1136/medethics-2013-101332 VL - 39 IS - 11 AU - Michelle McLean Y1 - 2013/11/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/39/11/708.abstract N2 - I read Robert Card's recent paper entitled ‘Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students’ with great interest.1 That Muslim students in America are able to conscientiously object (and this was entertained) to the cross-gender consultation is somewhat startling. I have just left the Middle East, where I worked as a medical educator for five-and-a-half years (2006–2011), and, to the best of my knowledge, even in the conservative, gender-segregated traditional Muslim culture of the United Arab Emirates, not once did a male or female student refuse to examine a patient of the opposite sex. Several issues, many of which have been described by Padela and del Pozo,2 should be taken into consideration in relation to Muslim students’ conscientious objection to the cross-gender consultation on religious grounds. Although Islam prohibits touching or physical contact by the opposite gender, unless appropriate (eg, by a spouse), in some circumstances, the ‘prohibited becomes permissible’.3 Medicine is one such circumstance. Islam does not … ER -