PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jacob Busch AU - Raffaele Rodogno TI - Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective AID - 10.1136/jme.2010.037275 DP - 2011 Feb 01 TA - Journal of Medical Ethics PG - 81--83 VI - 37 IP - 2 4099 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/37/2/81.short 4100 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/37/2/81.full SO - J Med Ethics2011 Feb 01; 37 AB - It has recently been suggested by Shaw (2007) that the distinction between voluntary active euthanasia, such as giving a patient a lethal overdose with the intention of ending that patient's life, and voluntary passive euthanasia, such as removing a patient from a ventilator, is much less obvious than is commonly acknowledged in the literature. This is argued by suggesting a new perspective that more accurately reflects the moral features of end-of-life situations. The argument is simply that if we consider the body of a mentally competent patient who wants to die, a kind of ‘unwarranted’ life support, then the distinction collapses. We argue that all Shaw has provided is a perspective that makes the conclusion that there is little distinction between voluntary active euthanasia and voluntary passive euthanasia only seemingly more palatable. In doing so he has yet to convince us that this perspective is superior to other perspectives and thus more accurately reflects the moral features of the situations pertaining to this issue.