PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Janet Malek
TI  - Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?
AID  - 10.1136/jme.2009.034645
DP  - 2010 Apr 01
TA  - Journal of Medical Ethics
PG  - 217--221
VI  - 36
IP  - 4
4099  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/4/217.short
4100  - http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/4/217.full
SO  - J Med Ethics2010 Apr 01; 36
AB  - This paper focuses on one objection to the use of reproductive genetic technologies (RGTs): the argument known as the expressivist objection. According to this argument, the choice to use reproductive genetic technologies to prevent the birth of individuals with disabilities is an expression of disvalue for existing people with disability. Many have been persuaded by this impassioned perspective. This paper shows that this argument is misguided and so does not constitute a sound objection to the use of RGTs to prevent disability in future children. It first identifies some responses to the objection that may be sound but not completely convincing to proponents of the expressivist position. It then describes a thought experiment designed to demonstrate more clearly that choosing to use RGTs to prevent disability in future children does not convey a negative message about people who have disabilities. After describing a decision that clearly does not send such a message, the paper walks through a series of cases and shows how, despite differences that might seem to be morally relevant, each is morally equivalent to the previous one with respect to the extent that it expresses disvalue for such individuals.