%0 Journal Article %A Lisa Fisher-Jeffes %A Charlotte Barton %A Fiona Finlay %T Clinicians’ knowledge of informed consent %D 2007 %R 10.1136/jme.2006.016758 %J Journal of Medical Ethics %P 181-184 %V 33 %N 3 %X Objective: To audit doctors’ knowledge of informed consent. Design: 10 consent scenarios with “true”, “false”, or “don’t know” answers were completed by doctors who care for children at a large district general hospital. These questions tested clinicians’ knowledge of who could give consent in different clinical situations. Setting: Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK. Results: 51 doctors participated (25 paediatricians and 26 other clinicians). Paediatricians scored higher than other clinicians (average correct response 69% v 49%). Only 36% (9/25) of paediatricians and 8% (2/26) of other clinicians realised that the biological father of a child born before 1 December 2003 needed a court order or a parental responsibility agreement to acquire parental responsibility, and thus be able to consent on behalf of his child, if he was not married to the child’s mother. Non-paediatric clinicians were unsure or incorrect when tested on situations where people with parental responsibility do not agree, or where young people (<16 years), who are Fraser competent do not want to consult their parents. Most clinicians did not know that the parents of a 20-year-old man with severe learning difficulties are unable to consent to surgery on his behalf, and many non-paediatricians were unclear on who could give consent when a child lived with foster parents. Conclusion: Clinicians who obtain consent for the treatment of children need to increase their knowledge on who is able to give informed consent to ensure best (legal and safe) practice. %U https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/3/181.full.pdf