PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - M A Graber AU - J F Tansey TI - Autonomy, consent, and limiting healthcare costs AID - 10.1136/jme.2003.003574 DP - 2005 Jul 01 TA - Journal of Medical Ethics PG - 424--426 VI - 31 IP - 7 4099 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/31/7/424.short 4100 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/31/7/424.full SO - J Med Ethics2005 Jul 01; 31 AB - While protection of autonomy is crucial to the practice of medicine, there is the persistent risk of a disconnect between the notion of self-determination and the need for a socially responsible medical system. An example of unbridled autonomy is the preferential use of costly medications without an appreciation of the impact of using these more expensive drugs on the resource pool of others. In the USA, costly medications of questionable incremental benefit are frequently prescribed with the complicity of both doctors and patients. Limiting self-determination in medication choices via an appreciation of the principle of justice reaches a better moral balance, while at the same time acknowledging the goals of doing good and avoiding harm in patient care.