PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Eric Wiland TI - Unconscious violinists and the use of analogies in moral argument AID - 10.1136/jme.26.6.466 DP - 2000 Dec 01 TA - Journal of Medical Ethics PG - 466--468 VI - 26 IP - 6 4099 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/26/6/466.short 4100 - http://jme.bmj.com/content/26/6/466.full SO - J Med Ethics2000 Dec 01; 26 AB - Analogies are the stuff out of which normative moral philosophy is made. Certainly one of the most famous analogies constructed by a philosopher in order to argue for a specific controversial moral conclusion is the one involving Judith Thomson's unconscious violinist. Reflection upon this analogy is meant to show us that abortion is generally not immoral even if the prenatal have the same moral status as the postnatal. This was and still is a controversial conclusion, and yet the analogy does seem to reveal in a very vivid way what makes abortion a reasonable response to a terrible situation. But Thomson's example has frequently been attacked on all sides for not being truly analogous to abortion. Here I develop a brand new analogy that sheds light on the issue with which Thomson was concerned, while at the same time avoiding most of the more serious objections made to her analogy.