TY - JOUR T1 - Reply to Ann Bradshaw. JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 13 LP - 15 DO - 10.1136/jme.22.1.13 VL - 22 IS - 1 AU - Peter Allmark Y1 - 1996/02/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/22/1/13.abstract N2 - My original paper suggested that an ethics of care which failed to specify how, and about what, to care would be devoid of normative and descriptive content. Bradshaw's approach provides such a specification and is, therefore, not devoid of such content. However, as all ethical approaches suggest something about the 'what' and 'how' of care, they are all 'ethics of care' in this broader sense. This reinforces rather than undermines my original conclusion. Furthermore, Bradshaw's 'ethics of care' has philosophical and historical problems which I outline. ER -