@article {Allmark13, author = {Peter Allmark}, title = {Reply to Ann Bradshaw.}, volume = {22}, number = {1}, pages = {13--15}, year = {1996}, doi = {10.1136/jme.22.1.13}, publisher = {Institute of Medical Ethics}, abstract = {My original paper suggested that an ethics of care which failed to specify how, and about what, to care would be devoid of normative and descriptive content. Bradshaw{\textquoteright}s approach provides such a specification and is, therefore, not devoid of such content. However, as all ethical approaches suggest something about the {\textquoteright}what{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteright}how{\textquoteright} of care, they are all {\textquoteright}ethics of care{\textquoteright} in this broader sense. This reinforces rather than undermines my original conclusion. Furthermore, Bradshaw{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteright}ethics of care{\textquoteright} has philosophical and historical problems which I outline.}, issn = {0306-6800}, URL = {https://jme.bmj.com/content/22/1/13}, eprint = {https://jme.bmj.com/content/22/1/13.full.pdf}, journal = {Journal of Medical Ethics} }