TY - JOUR T1 - Unfinished feticide: a legal commentary. JF - Journal of Medical Ethics JO - J Med Ethics SP - 68 LP - 70 DO - 10.1136/jme.16.2.68 VL - 16 IS - 2 AU - Margaret Brazier Y1 - 1990/06/01 UR - http://jme.bmj.com/content/16/2/68.abstract N2 - Jansen expresses concern as to the legal implications of both selective reduction of pregnancy and unsuccessful attempts at termination of pregnancy using mifepristone. This commentary examines the legality of both procedures and concludes that Jansen is over-optimistic in his belief that neither procedure is likely to fall foul of the criminal laws on induced abortion. By contrast his anxieties about civil liability arising from the subsequent live birth of a damaged infant are, it is suggested, unnecessarily pessimistic. Such an action is most unlikely to succeed if brought by the infant herself and any claim on the part of the mother will normally be dependent on proof of negligence. The commentary focusses on the law in England with relevant references to other common law jurisdictions. ER -